MYSTERY OF INIQUITY UNVEILED:
FREEMASONRY AND THE ORDER OF THE ILLUMINATI

Introduction

      It was generally believed that modern Freemasonry was created in 1717 when its Grand Lodge of England was established. It was also generally believed that it was Dr. James Anderson who wrote its "New Constitutions." (See, for instance, Paul A. Fisher, Behind the Lodge Door, Shield Publishing, Inc., P.O.Box 90181, Washington D.C.20090, p. 24). It is true that the new name was adopted in 1717, but the real founder of Freemasonry is not Anderson. Moreover, few people, including most of its members, know that its origin is 2000 years old. Indeed, as far as we know, none of the current books on Freemasonry traces Freemasonry to its true origin. Masonry was founded by King Herod Agrippa at the suggestion of Hiram Abiud, with the consent of Moab Levy, Adoniram, Johanan, Jacob Abdon, Antipas, Solomon Aberon, and Ashad Abia in the year 43. The original name was the "Mysterious Force." All its founders belonged to Judaism. In this article, we are going to present a true history based on the priceless manuscript written in Hebrew containing minutes of the meetings of the original founders of Masonry.

      The following sections on Masonry are based on the English translation of the original manuscript written in Hebrew of the History of Masonry. The History was transmitted from the nine founders only to the direct descendants of these founders. One of the original Hebrew copies was passed from Moab Levy, a founder, to Joseph Levy in 17th century. However, Joseph Levy's copy was robbed by Desaguliers, the founder of modern Masonry, after Levy was assassinated by Desaguliers. Joseph's son Abraham Levy died of tuberculosis two years after his marriage to Esther. Esther remarried to Abraham Abiud who was a direct descendant of Hiram Abiud, the real founder of the ancient Masonic Association. Abraham Abiud possessed another copy of the original manuscript. Their only female child, also named Esther, was married to Samuel Lawrence. Their son Jonas Lawrence had a son Samuel by his first wife but later married Janet a Christian Protestant and converted to Christianity. This only manuscript was passed on to Jonas who expressed his desire to publish it. But Jonas was assassinated for his conversion to Christianity and his illegal possession of the History because he was not a direct descendant of the Levy line. Jonas's will could not be carried out until his great grandson, Lawrence G. S. Lawrence born 1868, who was a Protestant, translated the History from Hebrew into English. In this translation, Mr. Lawrence -- the last Descendant of the owner of the history (the Hebrew manuscript) -- adopted the title: The Dissipation of the Darkness, the Origin of Masonry. In the following sections, we will quote extensively from the English translation of the Hebrew manuscript and the pages that contain the quotes refer to this document.

History of the Hebrew manuscript

      These are the words of Lawrence G.S. Lawrence:

Thus it is that I, Lawrence, son of George, son of Samuel, son of Jonas, son of Samuel Lawrence, of Russian origin, the last descendant of the descendants of one of the owners of this History, say: I inherited from my father a manuscript composed by our ancestors in the He

The Origin of Freemasonry

      Masonry was founded by King Herod Agrippa with other 8 Jewish Founders. 

      In the year 43, King Herod Agrippa summoned the court of Jerusalem and said:

      "Dear Brothers, you are not the King's men and his collaborators. You are the support of the King and the life of the Jewish people. Until now you have been his faithful followers. From this moment on you will be his brothers . . .

      "Let us all understand then, and let us not forget, that this fundamental meeting realized by this new group is based on Brotherhood . . .

      "My Brothers, the aristocracy as well as the common people have perceived the spiritual and even political revolt that the appearance of the Impostor Jesus ( as in the original) has caused among the people, and especially among our Israelites.

      "We have noted a great power in him, which he left as an inheritance to that group he called disciples. He founded an Association that he called a religion, it being called that by them as well. This supposed religion is at a point of overturning the foundations of our religion and demolishing it . . .

      "He attributed to himself the gift of prophecy and the power of performing miracles. He claimed to be the hoped-for Messiah of whom our prophets announced the coming; not being anything but a vulgar man like the rest of the people, devoid of any feature of the Divine Spirit, withdrawn to the extreme from the rectitude of our firm Jewish doctrine, from which we are determined not to deviate in even one point.

      "Never will we recognize such a person as the Messiah, nor will we recognize his divinity. We know that the hoped-for Messiah is not yet among us, nor has the time of his coming arrived. Nor has any sign been exhibited that might indicate his appearance. If we commit the error of letting our people follow him and be deceived, we convict ourselves of an unforgivable crime.

      "...We crucified him, he died and we buried him, leaving guards who watched the tomb. But it was claimed that he was risen, resurrected!... He disappeared in an unknown manner, in spite of the zealous vigilance and the security of the closure . . .

      "His leaving the tomb, my friends, was a decisive blow for his rivals; it was a powerful means that encourages his men to continue spreading his teachings and to prove the confirmation of his divinity . . .

"We will not recognize, on any point, a religion other than ours, the Jewish religion that we have inherited from our ancestors. Duty calls us to preserve it until the end time.

      "That blow had never been expected. That mysterious force had never been dreamed of. Our fathers attacked it and we continue attacking it. In spite of everything, astonishing! Their number increases. Observe with me how the son is separated from the father, the brother from his brother, the daughter from her mother, all alienating themselves to join that group. This affair encloses a great secret. How many men, how many women, how many entire families have abandoned the Jewish religion in order to follow those impostors, those partisans of Jesus. How many times they were threatened by the priests and authorities, in vain!" (The Dissipation of the Darkness, the Origin of Masonry, pp. 45-47).

      The original name of ancient Masonry was "The Mysterious Force"

      Hiram Abiud, the King's Counselor, who was the real founder of ancient Masonry, proposed the name of the association as the "Mysterious Force." This was his reason:

      "...It seems that there has been a hand, a force, secret, mysterious, that punishes us without our being able to offer resistance. It seems we have lost all our strength to defend our religion and our existence itself.

      "Majesty, based on the evidence that there is no efficacious means of incorporating our ideas, nor firm hope of attacking that force, undoubtedly mysterious; there is no other oath than to establish a Mysterious force, similar to that one (to attack mystery with mystery) (The End Days Editor's Note: phrase in brackets is in the original. End of Note.) I have come to the conclusion that it is our unavoidable duty, unless you have a better idea to establish an Association of greater power so it may assemble the Jewish forces threatened by that mysterious force. It is fitting that no one knows anything about this foundation, its principles and its actions. Only those whom Yours Majesty may choose as founders will know the secret of the foundation." (p. 43).

The frightful oath of founding members

The nine founders had to take a horrifying oath :

      "I, (John Doe, son of John Doe), swear by God, the Bible and my honor, that, having become a member of nine founders of the Association, 'The Mysterious force', I bind myself not to betray my brothers, the members in anything that might harm their persons, nor to betray anything concerning the decrees of the Association. I bind myself to follow its principles and to realize what is proposed tin the successive decrees approved by you, the nine founders, with obedience and precision, with zeal and fidelity. I bind myself to work for an increase in the number of its members. I bind myself to attack whoever follows the teaching of the Impostor Jesus and to combat his men until death. I bind myself not to divulge any of the secrets preserved among us, the nine; either among outsiders or among the affiliated members.

      "If I commit perjury and my betrayal is confirmed in that I have revealed some secret or some article of the decrees preserved among and our heirs this commission of eight companions will have the right to kill me by whatever means available." (pp. 51-52).

Meaning of instruments and symbols of Masonry

King Agrippa explained the meaning of instruments and symbols used in Masonry:

      "You already know that we must make everyone believe that our Association is very ancient... We will reinforce this deceit with the use of the instruments of construction that the architect Hiram utilized in the construction (of the Solomon Temple), such as the Square, the Compass, the Trowel, the Scales, the Hammer, etc., all of wood as Hiram Abiff had them." (p. 62).

      "...Every session will be opened by striking three times consecutively with this hammer; thus we will remember eternally through centuries, that we have crucified him and with this hammer we have fixed the nails in his hands and feet, killing him. These three stars you see symbolize the three nails (Note of The End Days : The Anti-Christ Maitreya has a "Great Sign" in his homepage on the WWW: http://www.maitreya.org/. Within this "great sign" are the three stars of David, telling the Jewish people that he is continuing the work of the 9 Masonic founders: to persecute the Catholic Church which is the mystical body of Jesus Christ. End of Note). We would be able to change them for three points that will have the same significance. Among our symbols will be the three steps, ridiculing with them this blasphemy: God is Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, with his claiming to be the Son." (p. 63).

      "Within our Association, we will make degrees, as we have mentioned previously. These will be thirty-three, symbolizing the age of the impostor. We will give a name to each degree and we will create other similar symbols. All these things were my ideas and those of brothers Moab and Hiram. The meaning of these ironic symbols must not be perceived; it must remain among the nine of us. For the other brothers or affiliates it is enough to make them see the utilities and instruments so they may believe that the Association was founded in the times of Solomon or earlier than this." (p.64).

      "Any brother can propose a new symbol."

      "What do you think and observe, brothers, concerning what I have presented to you?"

      The six men approved without objection, everything being recorded. (Note from the Original Manuscript: 6 men and the three proposers: the King, Moab, and Hiram. End of Note.)

      Then the King said: "Let us rejoice! Let us begin the march on the path of triumph! Let us take our first three steps! Let us strike three times with this victorious hammer, with the symbol of death for our enemy the Impostor, the symbol of the establishment of our honorable principles that we fix with the nails of brotherhood and union! Let us all exclaim with joy: Onward to victory!" (p. 64)

      During the First Session, the nine founders also created a new symbol: the apron that symbolized the protection of the clothing from the mud. This together with the Masonic instruments are to conceal the true purpose and to assure the affiliates of the antiquity of the Association. (p. 64).

      The King-President said: "I, with my authority as President (and not as King) grant each one of you the 33rd degree, the highest in our Association. . . . Since our brother Hiram is orphaned of his father since childhood, knowing no one other than his widowed mother, I propose to call our Association, "The Widow," asking your approval. From now on the name of the founders will be "The Sons of the Widow." Each member of the Association will call himself a son of the widow until the end of time because we believe that our Association will live until the end of time." (p. 65)

      (Note: King Agrippa became blind within five days of the illness of the eyes, then paralyzed, and died shortly afterward in the year 44. Acts of the Apostles (12:23) reported that the King was struck by an angel and eaten by worms before he died. Hiram Abiud replaced The King as president of the Association but disappeared mysteriously and his body was found eaten by vultures. Desaguliers became mad and died in extreme poverty).

The name was changed to Freemasonry on June 24, 1717 in London

      Masonry set up the Temple of Jerusalem and sent heir-descendant of Hiram Abiud to Rome to establish the two Temples of Rome and of Achaea. After the members of the latter two temples killed St. Peter and St. Andrew, the Temple of Rome became the presider of all temples in the East. The heir-descendant of Moab Levy was sent Russia, that of Adoniram to Gaul (France) and those of the successor of Abiud to Germany. The movement initiated by the Mysterious Force did not expand greatly due to the fear created by its name. Joseph Levy and Abraham Abiud, heir-descendants of Moab Levy and Hiram Abiud, were sent from Russia and Germany to London where they met John Desaguliers, who was a Protestant with intense hatred for Catholics. The three agreed on naming the Association : Freemasonry on August 25, 1716. Then on June 24, 1717, they met with the associations of architects and builders in London and officially launched the Association with the new name. Since 1717, the temples were changed to lodges.

      The counsels offered by Janet to her husband James (Jonas)

James said:

      Before beginning with her words, my wife required me to relate to her all the efforts and conspiracies that the Masons devised against Catholicism.

      I told her how, through my permanent contact with the grand Masons, I discovered that there are three groups of them in the lodges: Some attack Catholicism. Others attack all religions. The third, composed of men from the first two groups, battle in politics for the purpose of coming to dominate temporal authority.

      Here is what my wife said to me:

      "James, your affiliation with the new Masonry was not to support the enemies of religions, nor to support any religion, but, as we have resolved from the beginning, to study it and compare it with the Masonry of your ancestors for the purpose of completing this History."

      "We have both understood in the texts of this History the upset produced when your ancestor Levy changed the name o f the Association, together with Desaguliers. In accord with what you relate to me, there exists among us Protestants a sect united to the Jews (your relatives) whose goal is to demolish what our Jesus (sic), may He be glorified, and to crush Catholicism and the Roman Church. Such are the principles of Desaguliers and Anderson."

      "My parents and I, dear James, are not of that sect. Yes, we are Protestants, but we are far from the intention of crushing the Roman Church. Listen to what I tell you: We believe that Jesus Christ is the one who built it. and He said that it will not fall. You must have our faith in spite of our traditional revolt that we inherited from our parents against the authority of the Pontiff. In our hearts we conceal a firm faith that the Church of St. Peter is the original Church of Jesus. Never have we thought, neither my parents nor I, of associating with the enemies of the Church. You, who are now converted to Christianity through my intercession, must adopt the principles I have inherited from my parents. Be careful in collaborating with those two sects: the one that attacks Catholicism in particular and the other that attacks all religions in general. Be careful that you do not fall into their traps. Since you obeyed me and converted to my religion, you loved me and married me, I desire that you always continue firm with me in your Christianity, firm in your promises, and in your new principles.

      "Continue then in the path of completing the studies for which you entered the new Masonry, to succeed in satisfying our longings to reveal truth and to denounce evil, in order to dissipate the darkness when later the doors of light will be opened before the blindfolded eyes so they may orient themselves in the path of truth. And there on the peak of the solid mountain of reality the light will be irradiated that will guide each confused person and each confuser." (pp. 107-108)

      The objectives of Masonry were to destroy the Holy Roman Catholic Church, to create Socialism, and to establish domination of the whole world

      There are triple-objectives of the new Masonry: (a) to preserve Judaism for the Jews, (b) to attack Roman Catholicism, (c) and to embrace naturalism and nihilism. As a result, it acted for the demolition of thrones, the abolition of authorities, spiritual and temporal, so it may have absolute domination of the world. (p. 115). It preaches liberty, equality, and fraternity with perverse meaning: liberty without limits, liberty of blasphemies and deceits, liberty destructive of character, religions, wealth, lives and families; equality signifies the disappearance of all order, everything falling into confusion, with the loss of true values; fraternity is a brotherhood full of egotism and privileges, love of revenge, divisions, endless conflicts, betrayal, robbery, pride, profanation, and nihilism. If the new Freemasonry is the daughter of mother Masonry, Socialism is its granddaughter.

      The mother Masonry threw all her intention in a single goal, which was the battle against Jesus' men. The daughter Masonry (i.e. Freemasonry) surpasses that limit by great distances. It acts for the demolition of thrones and the abolition of authorities, spiritual and temporal, so it may have absolute domination of the world. (p. 115)

Jonas (James) Lawrence (1775-1825) predicted even before the birth of Communist theory (Karl Marx, 1848: Communist Manifesto) that the new Masonry will give birth to Socialism. Not only that, all the corrupt descendant organizations will be the daughters and granddaughters of mother Masonry. (p. 119).

      This is Jonas's own words:

      "Know, my son, that the new Masonry, responding to the demands of the enemy of humanity and fulfilling orders to increase the daughters of corruption, gave birth to Socialism. This granddaughter came to be evil worse than earlier evils.

      "I predict to you, Samuel, that all these creatures will grow and give birth, by Satanic spouses, to all other creatures of wickedness, corruption and destruction.

      "They will be multiplied and they will scatter their seeds over all the earth, corrupting it and how poisonous will be their fruits!

      "Each one of those creatures will form a party and each party will look out for the interests of its mother, aggravating the evils of confusion, civilization disappearing, eliminating religion and education degenerating. Then the trumpets of grief and disaster will blow.

      "This prophecy of mine will be fulfilled and will have a great echo. Our descendants will see infernal generations. Men will remember me, after my death. They will testify to this opinion of mine that all the corrupt descendants will be daughters and granddaughters of mother Masonry. How fitting this is, with respect to this: Evils beget nothing but evils." (p.119)

      Jonas prediction has been fulfilled for the most part.

      Janet's message to women of the world

      Janet, a Protestant who married Jonas, Mr. Lawrence's great grandfather, understood the evil plan of Masons to change the role of the woman contrary to God's will. She even foresaw with striking accuracy the present conditions of women. Here is Janet's analysis of Masonry's conspiracy to turn the woman into a tool of Satan to destroy human society.

      "Masons liberated her from all rules and conditions, having as a result the degeneration and misery of the woman. Our descendants will witness horrible spectacles born of the misery of the woman.

"The woman, with this exaggerated affection, was falsely exalted, fraudulently cultivating her pride without advising her of the irreparable loss that would be produced in her. With extremist liberty, the woman lost her temporal and eternal happiness, she lost her education, she lost her life and even more, she made the world lose family, social, educational and procreative order.

      "If she took comfort in this easy and voluptuous life, the result of this joy was misery and mourning, mourning and misery for all the world." (p. 122)

      As a result, to help admonishing the woman not to follow Masons' lure of 'liberty, equality, fraternity' into the trap, in the introductory section of the History of Masonry, The Dissipation of the Darkness, the Origin of Masonry, Mr. Lawrence included the words of Janet, as follows:

      "Woman! Since Creation you enjoy the greatest affection and respect in the world. Wise men, philosophers and great men have said of you. The woman rocks the cradle with her right hand and shakes the world with her left.

      "To you then, virtuous women, I present this History that it pleases me to call, 'The Dissipation of the Darkness,' and to you I say: For having influence my husband Jonas, the owner of this History, after his conversion to Christianity, and his being able to marry me, and for my having been the instigator of the idea of printing it and publishing it, you, too, must also share in the knowledge of its contents, to utilize what is within reach to convince men that Masonry is nothing but Judaism. To convince men that it was Masonry that made the pillars of nations totter, that demolished the powers, that rejected religion. It was Masonry that shed rivers of innocent blood with its Jewish cunning. It was Masonry, Masonry!

      "Know that every event contrary to Religion has its origin in Masonry.

      "By the monstrous exaggeration of the interpretation of the words: Liberty, Equality, Fraternity, the reins of human morals were loosened. It was Masonry that diffused disobedience to their duties in women, with the purpose of spreading extremism, corruption and prostitution. These are the purposes of the Mysterious Force and its daughter, Masonry.

      "Any contact with a Mason inspires in us, in one way or another, if not the despising of Religion, coldness toward it.

      "Here is the example: in the countries where Masons abound, spirituality, honor and virtues diminish. It is a frightening danger that threatens Humanity. The consequences will be disastrous for your daughters and sons and for the entire world.

      "You must, then, my friends, diffuse the facts in this History at each meeting, in every home, because religion is the foundation of all virtue, honor and justice." (p. 32)

Origin of the Order of Illuminati   

Illuminati: The Controller of All Masons

     In 1776, Adam Weishaupt, Professor of Catholic Church Canon Law at the University of Ingolstodt, Bavaria (Germany), founded the Order of Illuminati (Lucifer light bearers). Although trained as a Catholic Priest, he believed in Satanism and humanism. Humanism taught that a person could attain great power like unto God with the help from demons. He spent about five years writing on methods of world revolution under orders and pay from the Rothschild Dynasty with the aim of establishing One World Government. He called this government "The Novus Ordo Seculorum" (New Age or New World Order), which is also the title of his book published in May 1, 1776. This Latin phrase is printed on the reverse side of the one-dollar bill together with the year 1776 in Roman numeral at the bottom of the Masonic pyramid. On top of the pyramid is the eye of Lucifer with the inscription "Annuit Coeptis" which means he (Lucifer) has smiled on our undertakings. Most persons believe that the date 1776 honors the Birth of the U.S. No, it honors Weishaupt's One World for Satan.

      In 1785, a member of the order named Lanze, who was carrying the secret documents to the Grand Orient of the Illuminati in Paris (France), was struck by lightning at Ratisbon. The documents on his body were seized by the Bavarian government and now could be seen in the archives in Munich. They reveal the Illuminati activities not only in the French revolution but also the destruction of all Kings and religions, except Jewry. The time table for the 1789 French Revolution was carried out exactly as planned in the captured documents.

      Although the Illuminati order was independent in the beginning, it was grafted, at selected points, onto Freemasonry, like a fungus. Then on July 16, 1782, at the Congress of Wilhelnsbad, Germany, the order was given the reign of control over Freemasonry on a world-wide scale.

      The oath of submission is taken by the candidate for the membership as follows:

      "...I bind myself to perpetual silence and unshaken loyalty and submission to the Order, in the persons of my Superiors; here making a faithful and complete surrender of my private judgement, my own will, and every narrow-minded employment of my power and influence. I pledge myself to account the good of the Order, as my own, and am ready to serve it with my fortune, my honor, and my blood. Should I, through omission, neglect, passion, or wickedness, behave contrary to this good of the Order, I subject myself to what reproof or punishment my Superiors shall enjoin. The friends and the enemies of my Order shall be my friends and enemies; and with respect to both, I will conduct myself as directed by the Order, and am ready, in every lawful way, to devote myself to its increase and promotion, and therein to employ all my ability. All this I promise, and protest, without secret reservation, according to the intention of the Society which require from me this engagement. This I do as I am, and as I hope to continue, a Man of Honor." [John Robison, Proofs of a Conspiracy, 1798, pp. 66-67, available from Emissary Publications, 9205 SE Clackamas Road, #1776, Clackamas, OR 97015, (503) 824-2050].

Goals of the Illuminati

The Illuminati follow 7 main goals:

• Abolition of all national governments.
• Abolition of all religions except Satanism.
• Abolition of the family.
• Abolition of private property.
• Abolition of inheritance by high inheritance taxes.
• Abolition of patriotism.
• Creation of the world government under the United Nations controlled by the Illuminati.

Inside a Grand Lodge of Illuminati in Paris

      The following provides short summary from the book From A Nymph of Satan to a Bride of Christ, by Brother Vincent de Paul of the Immaculate, Heart , T.O.S.F., 1987, published by Third Order, P.O. Box 712, St. Louis, MO 63188 .

Introduction

      Klotilde Bersone was a ravishingly beautiful girl at 17, who was an honor student and could speak six languages. Her father was a Freemason. He lost 60,000 lires (about $700) in gambling and agreed to sell Klotilde to the Grand Lodge of the Illuminati in Istanbul, Turkey in exchange for the payment of this debt. This Turkish Lodge was connected to 6 other Grand Lodges of the Illuminati throughout the world. Bersone rose from the rank of "Nymph of the Night" to "Nymph Initiated to Secrets", "Illuminati", "Sovereign Grand Master Nymph", and then "Bride of Lucifer" or "Queen of the Illuminati".

      The initial setting was in Turkey in December 1874, but it was moved to Paris, France where in the beginning she was raped by the Grand Orient of the Supreme Lodge of Illuminati of France, the American General James Abram Garfield, and became his mistress. Garfield was elected to the House of Representatives while still a General fighting the civil war. He was a hero of Shilo and promoted to Major General. He was the youngest General (30) in the Civil War. He became Grand Orient of the French Illuminati in secret and spent much time in Europe as in America. In December 1863, at the request of President Abraham Lincoln, Garfield resigned as General and ran for Congress. He was congressman for 17 years, rising to the position of Republican House Leader. He was married in 1858 to Miss Lucretia Rudolph, and had 2 daughters and 3 sons. He was elected to the Senate in January 1880, but never served in that office. He was always absent in Paris with Masonic business. Illuminati Lodges wanted him to win the presidency.

      Garfield was elected President of the U.S. in March 1881 and was shot on July 2, 1881 by Charles Guiteau of France at the Baltimore & Potomac Railroad Station in Washington D.C. Garfield was expected to fully recover after being dismissed from the hospital. On August 11, while recuperating in a seaside cottage he wrote to his mother that he was recovering well and growing stronger every day. He signed it "Your loving son". He died mysteriously on September 19, 1881.

      Klotilde, full of hatred for everyone in the Masonic Lodges, was determined to learn all secrets about the Illuminati, to rise through the ranks, and eventually to reveal these secrets to the world in order to take revenge against those who had violated her womanhood and brought her innumerable misery and horror.

The original UNPUBLISHED manuscript of her diary was in Italian. It was translated into French and then German in 1931. It was translated into English in 1984 by a holy Jesuit Lithuanian Priest, Father Jonas Gaudze (died in 1985), who was the Superior of the Holy Seer, Portavoz, Mother Conchita, of the Franciscan Minims of Mexico City, Mexico.

Inside the Grand Lodge of the Illuminati of France

      First, to become member of the Order, Klotilde had to take a dreadful oath. In the making the oath, Klotilde had to kneel down with her head bent backwards, as though offering her throat to a dagger, and to swear the following oath:

• "I swear blindly to obey all orders of the Masonic Lodge, without questioning the reason for it.
• "I swear to not belong to any other religion except the Masons.
• "I swear to not give in to any influence, and to break any opposition (resistance) against the aim (goal) of the Masonic Lodge.
• "Should I become ever unfaithful to this oath, then may all daggers pierce me, which are now drawn against my throat."
• Klotilde discovered a death chapel where 18 skulls were laid on tables and altars. There was a white marble beast with 7 heads, which the masons call "Dragon Hydra". It looked terrible, with some beauty. Some heads looked like lions, some resemble panthers. Some had one horn, while others had several horns. The body was one of a leopard with black stripes. The short strong legs had powerful claws. The Grand Orient (General James Garfield, before he became U.S. President in March 1881) frequently invoked Satan to animate the marble beast. Here is his prayer of adoration:
• "I recognize you as the highest Being, which enlightens our minds and our actions. You also enlighten me especially, and you lead my arm. You have the supremacy of the Universe, and you move it because all is your creation (sic).
• "Heaven and earth belong to you, which are fulfilled with your glory, which are images of your greatness, and superiority. You are the light, strength and power. Show your might, which if wanted, can subject heart and mind. You are the helpful protector of each one of yours, you enemy of the crucified.
• "In your name, I curse God, The Trinity, Christ, and His Virgin Mother. Hear me, the one you possess, and who is one with you!
• "In trust of your revelations, in the faith of your might above all created, visible and invisible things. I have the right to request and receive from you what you know."

      After this and some chants in Yiddish language, the beast became alive. He howled and answered questions. Through this beast, Satan approved or disapprove proposals and decisions made by Masonic lodges throughout the world. And through the nymph of Beelzebub, he encouraged, urged, prodded, and guided the lodges to actions against the Catholic Church. The beast could take the form of a Dragon Hydra with 7 heads (only one of the heads wore a crown), then a man. He even appeared as a beautiful, richly adorned woman. He also showed himself as an Angel of Darkness. He put on these transformations to impress his bride, Klotilde. One time, the beast rained down gold pieces at her feet.

      To be high-initiated, she had to kill a man enclosed inside a hollowed human-size doll wearing a tiara (triple crown worn by Popes), to renounce her all Catholic Dogmas, the Sacraments and Jesus Christ, to be unbaptized, and to accept the Dragon (Lucifer) through the Beast (Beelzebub, the second highest demon after Lucifer, also called the Beast from the sea in chapter 13 of Apocalypse) as her Master.

      Before Klotilde became the nymph, she had to sign a pact with Satan in blood. The text of pact is as follows:

"I renounce the Holy Trinity, the Crucifixional Sacrifice of the Roman Catholic Religion. I renounce the belief in one God. I give up all secrets which are not revealed by the Spirit (Satan), and also the works, which do not originate from him. I give voluntarily to him, all of myself, my body, and my soul! I beg him to take exclusive possession of his ruling domain, my mind, my will, and my thinking. I call upon him to live and act in me as I also live and act in him. In his name, I curse Christ! the only true Catholic Church, and all His Sacraments!"

      In the rituals of initiation to the membership, countless acts of sacrilege were also given to a Consecrated Host stolen from the Catholic Church. One time, an apostate fallen Catholic Abbot (named Mazati) came to the lodge to say Mass and left 120 Consecrated Hosts for the sacrilege committed on Good Fridays. The Abbot had a more powerful way to order the Dragon to appear in the body of the 7-headed beast. He did not follow the rituals of adoration and incantation, which might take hours, but simply ordered the Dragon to appear in the name of the Holy Trinity, Father, Son and the Holy Ghost. Every time he used this, the Dragon Hydra revealed himself immediately and the marble beast became alive. Several of the Illuminati began using this new formula, because it was more effective and convenient in spite of the displeasure evidenced by Satan when it was used. On one occasion, the beast revealed that the real reason for the lodge to worship him was money. The beast also revealed to Klotilde all of the errors of all Non-Catholic Sects.

      The high Illuminati of Grand Lodge of Paris included President of France Jules Gr�vy, his Premier and many Ministers. But the highest among them was James Garfield, its Grand Orient. The Jewish Talmud was used as the Holy Book for prayer and incantation in the lodge.

      As the Nymph of Satan, she became the voice box for Beelzebub (Garfieldcalled him the "Masonry Spirit") issuing orders to the Lodges to kill or to take actions, which terrified many Grand Masters of the Lodges. She committed many murders under the order of the Lodges. Among the murdered victims were King of Italy Victor Emmanuel II and General James Garfield. In the latter case, the charge was that he had violated the rules of the Lodges by loving Klotilde, the bride of demon Beelzebub, and taking her as his mistress, thereby putting personal interest before the Lodges' interest. The assassination of Garfield was assisted by Prince Otto Eduard Leopold Von Bismark, the Chancellor of Germany. Bismark was also a Mason who provided the Paris Lodge with documents to show that Garfield committed treason against Masonry. This attack on Garfield was Bismark's revenge for the brutal knifing of Zemard, one of his Knights of Kadosch, who was sacrificed to the demon Beelzebub at the Paris Lodge on a Good Friday. Lucifer was totally discouraged when the Lodge decided to kill Garfield as the latter was brilliant in bringing ranking dignitaries into the pit of Masonry. Garfield had become one of Lucifer's favorites. Lucifer approved of this order since he must respect human free will. For even Lucifer himself could not control the passions of the Lodge's members. The Beast lamented to Klotilde:

      "I cannot tolerate the human race. Even my own Masons are demonstrating the vileness of human character in its avarice, and vulgar passions. These people do not given him (Lucifer) enough homage and gratitude. But how could these corruptible, selfish and low instinct, addicted earthlings be faithful? They are selfish to me, their master, who is giving them everything. . . . Treason was their element, and unrestrained pleasure was their role. They even defied the 'Holy' Laws of the Masonic Lodge."

So Lucifer resigned to taking souls with him to Hell whenever opportunity arose. Besides, by his nature, he loved to stir up jealousy and hatred for one another among different factions within the Grand Lodges. To the Beast, death to capture a soul is top priority over the success of the Lodge.  

      Jealousy among members for Klotilde's fast rise to the highest position in the Grand Orient Lodge and her sudden speeches outpouring the members' failures and omissions caused the majority of the Grand Council to turn against her. She had made them tremble by her knowledge of their deeds given by Lucifer.  

      The high initiates held a trial and decided to banish her to a brothel in Grenoble. This decision was approved by Lucifer who became disenchanted with her for her beginning dislike of him. Only when Klotilde became pregnant at the brothel did she make the critical decision to escape and take refuge in a Catholic cloistered convent in Paris. There, she became Sister Marie Amelie. She recounted her frightful story inside the Grand Lodge of Illuminati in Paris to her Mother Superior, who commanded her to write it down in 1885 for the public to know. The duplicate authentic manuscript of her memoirs of 1885 is kept somewhere in the archives of a Roman Catholic Covent in France.

Freemasonry, Order of Illuminati, and other Secret Societies

condemned by the Roman Catholic Church

Secret Societies condemned by The Catholic Church

IReactions by the Catholic Church are swift following the revival of the ancient Masonry in the new Freemasonry in England in 1717.  

      On April 28, 1738, Pope Clement XII in his Pontifical Constitution "In Eminenti" condemned Freemasonry as being Counter-Church and Counter-State. Thus said Pope Clement XII:  

      "Let us meditate upon the serious evils which are usually the result of those kinds of Societies or centers, not only concerning the peace of temporal States, but still more as regards the salvation of souls. Those Societies are not in agreement with the civil and economic laws of the States.  

      "In order to close the widely open road to iniquities; which might be committed with impunity and also for other reasons, just and reasonable, that have come to our knowledge . . . We have resolved and decreed to condemn and forbid such Societies, assemblies, reunions, aggregations or meetings called either Freemasonic or known under some other denomination. WE CONDEMN AND FORBID THEM BY THIS, OUR PRESENT CONSTITUTION, WHICH IS TO BE CONSIDERED VALID FOR EVER."  

      Pope Clement XII also extended the penalty of excommunication to any of the faithful who joined Masonry:  

      "WE COMMAND TO THE FAITHFUL TO ABSTAIN FROM INTERCOURSE WITH THOSE SOCIETIES . . . IN ORDER TO AVOID EXCOMMUNICATION, WHICH WILL BE THE PENALTY IMPOSED UPON ALL THOSE CONTRAVENING TO THIS, OUR ORDER. NONE, EXCEPT AT THE POINT OF DEATH, COULD BE ABSOLVED OF THIS SIN EXCEPT BY US OR THE THEN EXISTING ROMAN PONTIFF."  

      Pope Benedict XIV in 1751 affirmed in his Pontifical Constitution "Providas" that the condemnation of Freemasonry was IRREVOCABLE and was to be applied to the FUTURE as well as to the PRESENT."

Pope Pius VII in his Encyclical "Ecclesiam a Jesu-Cristo" in 1821 reiterated against the Freemasons the condemnations pronounced by Clement XII and Benedict XIV.  

      Pope Leo XII published his Encyclical "Quo Graviora" on March 13, 1825 condemning the society called Freemasonry, as well as all other Secret Societies.  

      Pope Pius VIII in his Encyclical "Traditi", published at the time of his advent on May 21, 1829 renewed all the condemnations of his predecessors, repeating that all Masonic Sects are issued from the "WELL OF PERDITION."  

      Pope Pius IX renewed the condemnation in the following terms:  

      We hereby confirm before you the Constitutions of Our Predecessors and in virtue of Our Apostolic Authority we hold up to reprobation and We condemn this Masonic Society and ALL OTHER SOCIETIES of the SAME ORDER which, although different in appearance, but pursuing the same aim against the Church or legitimate Civil Power are constantly being formed. It is Our order that all Christians of any standing whatsoever, of any rank or high appointment and OVER ALL THE EARTH should be informed that the said Societies are forbidden and reproved by US, and incur the same sentences and condemnations as those that are specified in the former CONSTITUTIONS of our Predecessors."  

      Pope Leo XIII published his magnificent Encyclical "Humanum Genus" on April 20, 1884. He writes:  

      "Today evil doers all seem allied in a tremendous effort inspired by and with the help of a society powerfully organized and widely spread over the world, it is the Society of Freemasons. In fact those people no longer even try to dissimulate their intentions, but they actually challenge each other's audacity in order to assail God's August Majesty.  

      "It is now publicly and overtly that they undertake to ruin the Holy Church, so as to succeed, if it is possible, in the complete dispossession of Christian nations of all the gifts they owe to Our Savior Jesus Christ.  

      "As a result, in the space of a century and a half, the sect of the Freemasons has made incredible progress. Making use at the same time of audacity and cunning, Masonry has invaded all the ranks of social hierarchy, and In the modern States it has begun to seize a power which is almost equivalent to Sovereignty.  

      "This peril was denounced for the first time by Pope Clement XII in 1738, and the Constitution promulgated by that Pope was renewed and confirmed by Benedict XIV; Pius VII followed in the footsteps of those Pontiffs, and Pope Leo XII including in his Apostolical Constitution 'Quo Graviora' all the deeds and decrees of the preceding Popes on that subject, RATIFIED AND CONFIRMED THEM FOR EVER. Popes Pius VIII, Gregory XVI and on several occasions Pope Pius IX spoke in the same manner."  

      Pope Pius X (1903-1914), Pope Benedict XV (1914-1922), and Pope Pius XI (1922-1939) continued affirming the condemnation of Masonry. Pope Pius XII made one specific reference to Freemasonry and Illuminism in his address to the Seventh Week Pastoral Adaptation Conference on May 23, 1958. He said, "the roots of modern apostasy lay in scientific atheism, dialectical materialism, rationalism, illuminism, laicism, and Freemasonry - which is the mother of them all . . . " (Quoted in Paul A. Fisher [1991], Their God is the Devil, American Research Foundation, Baltimore, Maryland, p. 53.)  

      The successors of Pius XII approved the Code of Canon Law of 1917 which explicitly condemned the Masons: "All those who enroll their names in the sect of Freemasons or similar associations which plot against the Church or the legitimate civil authorities incur by this very fact the penalty of excommunication, absolution from which is reserved simply to the Holy See." (Canon 2335).  

      The revised Code of Canon Law of 1983 stipulates: "One who joins an association which plots against the Church is to be punished with a just penalty; one who promotes or moderates such an association, however, is to be punished with an interdict." (Canon 1374).  

      Pope John Paul II promulgated the 1983 Code of Canon Law on January 25, 1983. On November 26, 1983, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith replied to an inquiry whether the Church's position regarding Masonic organizations has been altered, especially since no explicit mention is made of them in the New Code of Canon Law [1983], as there was in the Old Code [1917]. The Congregation stated that organizations were omitted in the New Code due to a different criterion adopted in drafting the code. They were included in broader categories. [See Canon 1374.] The Congregation did not, however, specify the categories it had in mind (it might have been thinking of such canons as Canon 1364), but it insisted that the Church is still opposed to Masonic associations, since their principles are irreconcilable with the Church's doctrine and that it would be seriously wrong to join them.  

      [Note: Canon 1364 of 1983 Code states:  

      �1. With due regard for canon 194, �1, n. 2, an apostate from the faith, a heretic or a schismatic incurs automatic (latae sententiae) excommunication and if a cleric, he can also be punished by the penalties mentioned in canon 1336, �1. nn. 1, 2 and 3.  

      �2. If long lasting contumacy or the seriousness of scandal warrants it, other penalties can be added including dismissal from the clerical state.]

Freemasonry Condemned by the States of New York, Pennsylvania, and Massachusetts

      Paul A. Fisher [1991] reports in his book Their God is the Devil that between 1829 and 1836 the legislatures of the States of New York, Pennsylvania and Massachusetts investigated Freemasonry and found it to be "a moral evil -- a distinct independent government within our own government, and beyond the control of the laws of the land by means of its secrecy, and the oaths and regulations which its subjects are bound to obey, under penalties of death" (p. 18.)  

      Documents Show Freemasons and Illuminati as Ignitiators of Wars and Revolutions

Masons admitted that they are ignitiators of revolutions and wars

French Revolution

      Today Freemasonry openly acknowledges the French Revolution as its work. In the chamber of Deputies during the session on July 1, 1904 the Marquis de Rosanbo stated:  

      "Freemasonry has worked in a hidden but constant manner to prepare the revolution... We are then in complete agreement on the point that freemasonry was the only author of the revolution, and the applause which I receive from the Left, and to which I am little accustomed, proves, gentlemen, that you acknowledge with me that it was masonry which made the French revolution."  

      Mr. Jumel: "We do more than acknowledge it, we proclaim it."  

      [Source: Mgsr. Henri Delassus, La Conjuration anti-chr�tienne, vol. 1, 1910, p. 146; quoted in de Poncins, op. cit.,p.30].

Revolution in Italy

      In the following we quote Paul A. Fisher (1991) from his book Their God is the Devil, American Research Foundation, Inc., P.O. Box 5687, Baltimore, Maryland 21210.  

      "The moderate and constitutional demands of the Masonic lodges began to be accompanied, by more democratic demands, and there were in Milan, Bologna, Rome, and Naples cells of Illuminati, republican freethinkers, after the pattern recently established in Bavaria by Adam Weishaupt. . . . In the south the first pro-revolutionary centres developed in connection with the Masonic lodges; an example is the Celestini Lodge at Naples." Encyclopedia Britanica, 1977, Vol. 9, History of Italy and Sicily, p. 1155.)  

      The rebellion in Italy against Papal governments during 1830s "was known as the 'Risorgimento' which, in reality, was a classic Masonic revolutionary movement. Its leaders were Giuseppe Mazzini, Giuseppe Garibaldi, Camillo Cavour and King Victor Emmanuel II -- all ardent Freemasons." (Fisher [1991], p. 17.) (was later poisoned by his own son, Prince Umberto, who, in turn, was assassinated by the order of Masonic lodges.)  

      "Mazzini, according to the Grand Commander of Scottish Rite Freemasonry in America, was the first head of modern Freemasonry in Italy. (ibid, p. 17.)  

      "One historian, Charles Heckethorn, in his book, Secret Societies, says the chilling word "Mafia" is an acronym meaning 'Mazzini Autoriza Furti, Incendi, Avelenameti:' that is: 'Mazzini authorizes thefts, arson and poisoning.' (ibid., p.17.)  

      "The December 1920 issue of the New England Craftsman, a Masonic journal, reported that 'practically all the heroes of Italian liberty were Masons.' (ibid., p. 17.)  

      "The Scottish Rite Grand Commander wrote in the May, 1941 issue of the NEW AGE magazine (the flagship publication of Scottish Rite Masonry of the Southern jurisdiction) that Mazzini and Cavour were Masons 'who put Victor Emmanuel I on the throne of Italy.' (ibid., p.18.)  

      "The Grand Commander also said Garibaldi (who became Grand Master of Masonry in Italy in 1865) called for the Pope to be overthrown and "that there be built upon his ruins a reign of truth and reason [that would] eliminate the priests of God. . ."(ibid., p. 18.)  

      "Charles Lobinger, in his History of the Scottish Rite (p. 827) related that the Grand Commander of the Italian Supreme Council, Raoul Palermi, attended a meeting of the Supreme Council of the Scottish Rite in the United States in 1921 and told how the Scottish Rite 'prospered and spread in our provinces, contributing largely to prepare the Revolution for their liberation from the petty tyrants and from the Pontifical Dictatorship . . .' (ibid., p. 18.)

Turkish and Portugese Revolutions

      In the time of the Turkish revolution, a Jew said proudly to a Hungarian lady's father:

"It is we who are making it, we, the Young Turks, the Jews."  

      During the Portuguese revolution, she heard the Marquis de Vasconcellos, Portuguese Ambassador at Rome, say:  

      "The Jews and the Freemasons are directing the revolution in Lisbon."

She further noted that:  

      "today when the greater part of Europe is given up to the revolution, they are everywhere leading the movement, according to single plan."  

      She asked how they succeeded in concealing the plan which embraced the whole world and which was not the work of a few months or years? She answered that the Jews know how to keep a secret and that none of them betrayed the others. (Source: Cecile de Tormay, Le livre Poscrit, p. 135).

European Revolution

      In the following, we are going to quote Benjamin Disraeli before he became the Chancellor of the Exchequer of Great Britain in 1856. These quotes are taken from Hansard's Parliamentary Debates, (the equivalent of our Congressional Record). (Our quotes are based on Fisher [1991], pp. 18-19). On July 14, 1856, Benjamin Disraeli rose in the House of Commons to say:  

      ". . .There is in Italy a power which we seldom mention in this House, but without considering and understanding which we shall never rightly comprehend the position of Italy. I mean the secret societies. The secret societies do not care for constitutional government . . .  

      "lt is useless to deny. . . a great part of Europe - the whole of Italy and France, and a great portion of Germany, to say nothing of other countries -- are covered with a network of these secret societies, just as the superficies of the earth is now being covered with railroads. And what are their objects? They do not attempt to conceal them. They do not want constitutional government. They do not want ameliorated institutions; they do not want provincial councils nor the recording of votes; they want. . .an end to ecclesiastical establishments. . . .  

      "I am told that a British Minister has boasted -- and a very unwise boast it was -- that he had only to hold up his hand and he could raise a revolution in Italy tomorrow. . ."  

      "A great prince fell suddenly. . . solely and entirely by the action of secret societies. That I apprehend is a fact which no man acquainted with the events of 1848 will deny!'  

      Mr. Disraeli was referring to the 1848 revolutions which rocked France, Italy, Germany and Austria, during which Prince Metternich, the well-known Austrian Foreign Minister, was forced to seek refuge in England.  

      An extraordinary political figure in Great Britain, twice Mr. Disraeli became Prime Minister (1868 and 1874-1880). He accepted a peerage with the title Earl of Beaconsfield in 1876. While he was Prime Minister, he delivered a speech at Aylesbury on September 20, 1876, in which he said:  

      "In the attempt to conduct the government of this world, there are new elements to be considered which our predecessors had not to deal with . . .the secret societies -- an element which at the last moment may baffle all our arrangements, which have their agents everywhere, which have reckless agents which countenance assassination, and which, if necessary, could produce a massacre."

The Philippine Insurrection

      Let's quote Paul A. Fisher [1988] Behind the Lodge Door, on the Phillipine Insurrection:  

      "Conventional wisdom says the Philippine Insurrection of 1896 was ignited because of native opposition to the power of the Catholic Church in the Islands. The revolutionary fire was fueled by the writings of Jose Rizal, augmented by the political leadership of Emilio Aguinaldo.  

      "In reality the Philippine Insurrection was orchestrated by Freemasonry, and while Emilio Aguinaldo indeed led that revolution, he did so as a dedicated member and tool of the Craft.  

      "That insight into Philippine history was suppressed by the United States Government for 45 years, until it finally was revealed by historian John T. Farrell in 1954." (Fisher [1988], pp. 211-212)

Russian Revolution

      Again, let's quote Fisher on the Russian revolution  

      "The Scottish Rite monthly [New Age] added: 'The first Revolution in March 1917 is said to have been inspired and operated from these lodges and all the members of Kerenski's government belonged to them.'" (ibid., p. 218)

World War I

      It is well known that the assassination of the Austrian Archduke Franz Ferdinand triggered the World War I. Let's quote Fisher on the great war.  

      "Not mentioned by the Scottish Rite journal [New Age] was the fact that the alleged assassins of the Archduke were members of the "Black Hand," a South Slav revolutionary organization which was a progeny of Freemasonry.  

      "During the trial, Princep testified that his colleague, Ciganovitch, 'told me he was a Freemason;' and, on another occasion, 'told me that the Heir Apparent [Franz Ferdinand] had been condemned to death by a Freemason's lodge.'  

      "Moreover, another of the accused assassins, Chabrinovitch, testified that Major Tankositch, one of the plotters, was a Freemason." (ibid, pp. 217-218)

Domination of Governments

      Finally, the following excerpt from Fisher [1988] shows clearly that the top-level Freemasons know about the true origin of their secret organization and understand the symbols devised by King Herod Agrippa:  

      "In 1976, a book by Fred Zeller, former Grand Master of the Grand Orient of France, titled, Trois Points, C'est Tout ( Three Points, That's all), revealed that between 1912 and 1971, all of the Third and much of the Fourth Republic of France was dominated by Freemasons, who fought two major anti-clerical reforms in a battle against Church influence.  

      "And, in 1981, the world learned of the machinations of Grand Master Licio Gelli's Masonic Lodge known as Propaganda Due, or P-2, which precipitated the fall of the Italian Government that same year." (ibid., p. 21)  

Freemasonry financed the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia 1917

      In this section we are going to quote Larry Abraham from his book Call It Conspiracy, Double A Publications, P.O. Box 609, Wauna, Washington 98395.

      First, the leftist movement in the U.S was financed by the international bankers. Larry Abraham (p. 68) quotes Oswald Spengler, the great historian of the 20th century:

      "There is no proletarian, not even a Communist, movement that has not operated in the interests of money, in the direction indicated by money, and for the time being permitted by money -- and that without the idealists among its leaders having the slightest suspicion of the fact." (Decline of the West, Modern Library, New York, 1945)

      The Reece Committee which investigated foundations for Congress in 1953 proved with an overwhelming amount of evidence that the various Rockefeller and Carnegie foundations have been promoting socialism since their inception. (See Ren� Wormser's Foundations: Their Power and Influence, Devin Adair, New York, 1958.) (Abraham, p. 70)

      Larry Abraham asserts that "the conspiracy had been planning the war (World War I) for over two decades. The assassination of an Austrian Archduke was merely an incident providing an excuse for starting a chain reaction." (p.71) But we know now that even that "incident" was planned as well.

      The war prolonged despite the stalemate in the battle front because of the entry of the U.S. into the war. Winston Churchill once observed that the world would have been better if the U.S. stayed out of it since "peace would have been made with Germany, and there would have been no collapse in Russia leading to Communism; no breakdown of government in Italy followed by Fascism; and Naziism never would have gained ascendancy in Germany." (Social Justice Magazine, July 3, 1939, p. 4). But "World War I was a financial bonanza for the international bankers." (ibid., pp. 74-75)

      The Bolshevik Revolution happened, not because of the downtrodden masses rising up against exploiting bosses as the communists perpetuate the big lie, but because very powerful men in Europe and the United States sent Lenin in Switzerland and Trotsky in New York to Russia to organize it. (ibid., p. 76).

      "Lenin was sent across Europe-at-war on the famous "sealed train." With him Lenin took some $5 to $6 million in gold. The whole thing was arranged by the German high command and Max Warburg, through another very wealthy and lifelong socialist by the name of Alexander Helphand, alias "Parvus." When Trotsky left New York with an American passport with his entourage of 275 revolutionaries. (ibid., pp. 76-77)

      Jacob Schiff, senior partner in Kuhn, Leob & Co., and father-in-law of Max Warburg's brother Felix, also helped finance Leon Trotsky. According to the New York Journal-American of February 3, 1949: ""Today it is estimated by Jacob's grandson, John Schiff, that the old man sank about 20,000,000 dollars for the final triumph of Bolshevism in Russia." (ibid., pp. 77-78)

      Arsene de Goulevitch, an important White Russian General, wrote in his book Czarism and the Revolution :

      "The main purveyors of funds for the revolution, however, were neither the crackpot Russian millionaires or the armed bandits of Lenin. The 'real' money primarily came from certain British and American circles which for a long time past had lent heir support to the Russian revolutionary cause. . . . The important part played by the wealthy American banker Jacob Schiff in the events in Russia, though as yet only partially revealed, is no longer a secret." (ibid., p. 78)

      General Alexander Nechvolodov is quoted by de Goulevitch as saying that:

      "In April 1917, Jacob Schiff publicly declared that it was thanks to his financial support that the revolution in Russia had succeeded."

      Schiff's participation in the Bolshevik Revolution was well known among Allied intelligence services at the time. Later evidence indicates that the bankrolling of the Bolsheviks was handled by a syndicate of international bankers, which in addition to the Schiff-Warburg clique, included Morgan and Rockefeller interests. Documents show that the Morgan organization put at least $1 million in the Red revolutionary kitty. The paymaster of these funds in Petrograd, where the Revolution started, was Lord Alfred Milner, head of the secret "Round Table" Group which was backed by Lord Rothschild. De Goulevitch reveals that:

      "In private interviews I was told that over 21 million roubles were spent by Lord Milner in financing the Russian Revolution." (ibid., pp. 79-80)

      Professor Antony Sutton of Stanford University's Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace, using for the most part, official State Department documents, shows conclusively that virtually everything the Soviets possess has been acquired from the West. It is not much of an exaggeration to say that the U.S.S.R. was made in the U.S.A. (ibid., p. 83)

Financial International built up Communism, started WWI, WWII, and created the Stock Market Crash in 1929 and The Great Depression 1930-1939

       Let us introduce a document which is extremely important for the 20th century because it reveals the plan of action of the illuminati and freemasonry in one of the most critical phases of the world history. The plan was carried out just as it actually happened as recorded by history books. This document has been compared to the Magna Carta.

       Christian G. Rakovsky, a founding member of Communism in the U.S.S.R., and who later was the Soviet Ambassador to Paris, became a victim of Stalin's purges and the show-trials of 1938. His importance in world events was described by Leon Trotzky, Lenin's comrade and Minister of Defense in the Bolshevik government, in My Life, An Attempt at an Autobiography (Pengui Books, Ltd., c. 1928):

       "Christian G. Rakovsky is, internationally, one of the best known figures in the European Sodalist involvement. A Bulgarian by birth, . . . he is a Roumanian subject by dint of the Balkan map, a French physician by education, a Russian by connections, by sympathies and literary work. He speaks all the Bal kan and four European languages; he has at various times played an active part in the inner workings of four Socialist partjes - the Bulgarian, Russian, French and Roumanian -- to become eventually one of the leaders of the Soviet Federation, a founder of the Communist Intemational, President of the Ukrainian Soviet of People's Commissaries, and the diplomatic Soviet representative in England and France --  only to share finally the fate of all the 'left' opposition. Rakovsky's personal traits, his broad international outlook, his profound nobility of character, have made him particularly odious to Stalin, who personifies the exact opposite."

       While in prison, Rakovsky was interviewed by Stalin's foreign agent, Gavriil G. Kusmin (known as Gabriel). During the interview, Rakovsky revealed an astounding and convincing plan for starting World War II, which Stalin accepted. Based on this information, Stalin freed Rakovsky. The interview was witnessed by Dr. Jose�  Landowsky, a Russianized Pole who lived in Moscow. The questioning took place in French and Dr. Landowsky was asked to translate it into Russian. Besides a copy he made for himself, the original document will be found in the Russian Archives. The interview was taken from a Spanish book La Lucha Por El Poder Mundial and was translated into English by George Knupffe. The English translation can be found in the book Red Symphony by J. Landowsky, (London: The Plain Speaker Publishing Co., 43 Bath Road, W6). The following summary is based on the excerpts in Toward World Government, New World Order, by Deirdre Manifold and edited by Cornelia R. Ferreira, Toronto: Canisius Books, 1993, pp. 26-52. In the paragraphs below, statements in double quotes are made by Rakovsky except otherwise indicated.

       The plan proposed by Rakovsky was made in 1938 before the world war II started in 1939 and was literally accomplished. The plan reveals that:

The First Communist International was Adam Weishaupt who was connected to the House of Rothschild.

Karl Marx and the highest chiefs of that First Communist International were controlled by Baron Lionel Rothschild.

The House of Rothschild was among the Financial International (henceforth, FI) which created the Revolutionary International: "to create with the help of Capitalism, ccumulation of the highest degree, to push the proletariat towards strikes, to sow hopelessness, and at the same time to create an organization which must unite proletarians with the purpose of driving them into revolution. This is to write the most majestic chapter of history." The mother of five Rothschild brothers remarked: "If my sons want it, then there will be no war." In Rakovsky's words: "This means that they were the arbiters of peace and war, but not emperors . . . . Is not war already revolutionary function? War -- the Commune. Since that time every war was a giant step towards Communism . . . ."

The Financial International through Jacob Schiff, an agent of the House of Rothschild, financed Japan in the Russo-Japanese War in which Russia was defeated. This defeat called forth the revolution in 1905 which laid political conditions for the Bolshevik victory in 1917.

Trotzky was among the people behind the assasination of Austrian Archduke Ferdinand which provoked the First World War. The defeats of the Tsar's army was organized by the FI. Trotzky, more than Lenin, was collaborator of the FI which ordered Kerensky to surrender the State to Communism. The Bolsheviks took that which the FI gave them. Communism was indebted to Kerensky much more than to Lenin.

The FI financed the October Revolution, Rakovsky said, "in particular through those same bankers who had financed Japan in 1905, i.e., Jacob Schiff and the brothers Warburg; that means through the great banking constellations, through one of the five banks who are members of the Federal Reserve, through the bank of Kuhn, Loeb and Co. . . . also other American and European bankers, such as Guggenheim, Hanquer, Breitung, Aschber, the 'Nye-Banken' of Stockholm. I was there "by chance," there in  Stockholm, and participated in the transmission of funds. Until Trotzky arrived, I was the only person who was an intermediary from the revolutionary side."

The FI arranged for Lenin and Trotzky to pass freely through all the Allied control.

Masonry was involved in the Bolshevik Revolution.

The Versaills Treaty and The League of Nations served as a revolutionary pre-condition. The Versailles Treaty was designed to create preconditions for the proletariatization of Germany, for unemployment and hunger, as the result of which the Communist Revolution in Germany should have triumphed.

The FI wanted Trotzky to be the dictator of U.S.S.R. instead of Stalin so that the FI would be the chiefs of International Communism. The absolute dictatorship of Stalin was too much for the FI to bear. They considered he had become another Tsar. His main sin was to subject the revolution to the State instead of the State to the Revolution. But the FI was afraid that if Stalin was destroyed, Communism could be destroyed with him.

To destroy the Bourgeois States, war is necessary. But war should not be waged against U.S.S.R.

So the solution to this problem was for the FI to finance Hitler rise to power. The Warburgs were sent as Ambassadors to Hitler and agreed to finance the National Socialist Party, and the latter received in a couple of years millions of dollars, sent to it from Wall Street, and millions of marks from German financiers through Schacht. However, Hitler violated the rule: he took over for himself the privilege of manufacturing money, and not only physical monies, but also financial ones. Thus Hitler was slated for destruction together with the Bourgeois States.

The other two reasons for war are nationalism and Christianity. Rakovsky stated, "In reality, Christianity is our only real enemy."

"Every sincere Communist imitating his idol Lenin, and the greatest revolutionary strategists must always wish for war. Nothing is so effective in bringing nearer the victory of revolution as war. This is a Marxist-Leninist dogma."

The aim is to force Hitler to advance westward against the Allied all of whom were Christian countries instead of eastward. The FI will make sure that the Allied declares only on Hitler and not the U.S.S.R. On the contrary, the U.S.S.R ought to be helped. The U.S. will not enter the war if it is not attacked. "But U.S. rulers can arrange that they will be attacked. The aggression against America can be invented. The Capitalistic States will destroy each other if one brings about a clash of their two wings: the fascist and the bourgeois."

"There is only one aim, one single aim: the triumph of Communism. It is not Moscow which will impose its will on the democratic States, but New York; not the 'Comintern,' but the 'Capintern' on Wall Street." In the war, the democratic states and the fascist state will be exhausted but U.S.S.R. will gain strength. "Who other than he could have been able to impose on Europe such an obvious and absolute contradiction? What force can lead it towards complete suicide?Only one force is able to do this: money. Money is power and the sole power."

"The stock market crash on October 24, 1929 was more important for the revolution than the October Revolution. It was called a real revolution" since it started the great depression. Rakovsky says: "The four years of the government of Hoover are years of revolutionary progress: twelve and fifteen million on strike. In February, 1933, there takes place the last stroke of the crisis with the closing of the banks. It is difficult to do more than Capital did in order to break the "classical American," who was still on his industrial bases, and in the economic respect, enslaved by Wall Street.... the four years of the rule of Hoover were used for the preparation of the seizure of power in the United States and the U.S.S.R.; there, by means of a financial revolution, and here, with the help of war and the defeat which was to follow . . . . You can understand that the execution of the plan on such a scale requires a special man, who can direct the executive power in the United States, who has been predetermined to be the organizing and deciding force. That man was Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt. And permit me to say that this two-sexed being is not simply irony. He had to avoid any possible Delilah."

You will see for example the paradoxical pnenomenon that a whole crowd of people, enemies of Stalin, will help him -- no, they will not necessarily be proletarians, nor will they be professional spies. There will appear influential persons at all levels of society, even very high ones, who will help the Stalinist formal Communism when it becomes, if not real, then at least objective Communism. . . . In Moscow there is Communism, in New York, Capitalism. It is all the same as a thesis and anti-thesis. Analyze both. Moscow is subjective Communism, but (objective State) Capitalism. New York: Capitalisem subjective, but Communism objective. A personal synthesis, truth: the Financial International, the Capitalist-Communist one - "They."

Before the trial of Rakovsky on March 11, 1938, U.S. Ambassador Davis hinted that much would be gained in the public opinion in America if an amnesty for Rakovsky was effected. The Ambassador attended the trial which the court in the end declared that Rakovsky did not involve in any plot against the State. After he was released, Rakovsky confessed that he made a secret sign of Masonic greeting to Davis.

        All events that followed after this interview in 1938 occurred as though they were acted out of a movie script. Professor Antony C. Sutton in his book Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler (Seal Beach, CA: '76 Press, 1976)  proves conclusively that the American financiers provided the money and mate�riel to Hitler to launch World War II. That the international bankers participated in the financing of the Bolshevik revolution as documented by his book Wall Street and The Bolshevik Revolution (Rochelle, NY: Arlington House, 1981) together with other data provided by other authors cannot be questioned. In addition, Sutton in his monumental 3 volumes Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development 1917-1965 (Stanford, California: Hoover Institution Press, 1973) demonstrates beyond a reasonable doubt that all the technology, the know-how, much of the raw material and most of the funds to build the industrial and military machine with which the U.S.S.R. threatened the free world came from the U.S. That menacing military machine could well have been stamped: "Made in the U.S.A."

       The greatest military and technological assistance to the Russian government came during WWII under the Lend-Lease Program. The U.S. government provided over $11 billion worth of war-making goods to the Soviets from submarine chasers, bombers and fighters, naval guns to petrolium refineries, locomotives, factories, trucks and trailers.  Worse of all, the U.S. government had given Russia the atomic bomb in 1943. This was discovered by Major George Racey Jordan who was the officer in charge of the transfer of the Lend-Lease supplies through the Great Falls, Montana, air base. He found documents on bomb-making and mate�riel (nearly three quarter of a ton of uranium). James Roosevelt, the son of President Franklin Roosevelt, in a 1980 novel A Family Matter details how his father gave Russia the plans to build the atomic bomb in 1943 and 1944.  The dust cover of the book informs the reader that James Roosevelt has "written a novel of spine-chilling drama and authenticity." (emphasis added). Russia exploded its first atomic bomb in 1949. (A. Ralph Epperson, The Unseen Hand, Tucson, Arizona: Publius Press, 1985, p. 330-331).

       Only one point needed to be clarified: how the U.S. entered the war. Here is the excerpts from the article "Fake Terror -- The Road to Dictatorship" by Alex Jones at www.infowars.com.

       " The way open to war was created when Japan signed the tripartite agreement with Italy and Germany, with all parties pledging mutual defense to each other.   Hitler would never declare war on the United States regardless of the provocation, the means to force Japan to do so were readily at hand.

       "The first step was to place oil and steel embargoes on Japan, using Japan's wars on the Asian mainland as a reason. That forced Japan to consider seizing the oil and mineral rich regions in Indonesia.  With the European powers militarily exhausted by the war in Europe, the United States was the only power in the Pacific able to stop Japan from invading the Dutch East Indies.  By moving the Pacific fleet from San Diego to Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, Roosevelt made a pre-emptive strike on that fleet the mandatory first step in any Japanese plan to extend its empire into the 'southern resource area'.

       "Roosevelt boxed in Japan as completely as Crassus had boxed in Spartacus. Japan needed oil. They had to invade Indonesia to get it. They first had to remove the threat of the American fleet at Pearl Harbor.  There never really was any course open to them.

       "To enrage the American people as much as possible, Roosevelt needed the first overt attack by Japan to be as bloody as possible, appearing as a sneak attack much as the Japanese had done to the Russians.  From that moment up until the attack on Pearl Harbor itself, Roosevelt and his associates made sure that the commanders in Hawaii, General Short and Admiral Kimmel, were kept in the dark as much as possible about the location of the Japanese fleet and its intentions. They became scapegoats for the attack. (Congress recently exonerated both Short and Kimmel, posthumously restoring them to their former ranks).

       "But as the Army board had concluded at the time and subsequent de-classified documents confirmed, Washington DC knew the attack was coming, knew exactly where the Japanese fleet was, and knew where it was headed.  (In fact, Roosevelt moved aircraft carriers with planes and protective destroyers away to make Pearl Harbor a better 'lamb'.)

       "On November 29th, Secretary of state Hull showed United Press reporter Joe Leib a message with the time and place of the attack. The New York Times in its special 12/8/41 Pearl Harbor edition, on page 13, reported that the time and place of the attack had been known in advance!

       "The much repeated claim that the Japanese fleet maintained radio silence on its way to Hawaii was a lie. Among other intercepts still held in the Archives of the NSA is the UNCODED message sent by the Japanese tanker Shirya stating, 'proceeding to a position 30.00 N, 154.20 E. Expect to arrive at that point on 3 December.' (near Hawaii)."

       Franklin Roosevelt once said: "Things do not just happen; they are planned that way." An illustration of the way "things are planned' is provided by a quotation from the book Far and Wide by the well-known British writer Douglas Reed (London: Jonathan Cape, 1951). In this quote, Reed reports prophecy made in 1942:

       "What real purpose did Mr. Roosevelt promote through the way he used his imperial powers ? He furthered the main principles of a plan for the redistribution of the earth published in 1942 (but clearly prepared much earlier) by a mysterious 'Group for a New World Order', headed by a Mr. Moritz Gomberg. What this group proposed was starding at the time but proved farsighted. The main recommendations were that the Communist Empire should be extended from the Pacific to the Rhine, with China, Korea, Indo-China, Siam and Malaya in its orbit; and that a Hebrew State should be set up. These two projects were largely realized. Canada and numerous 'strategic islands'   were to pass to the United States (the reader should keep these 'strategic islands' in mind). The remaining countries of Western Europe were to disappear in a 'United States of Europe' (this scheme is being vigorously pursued at present). The African continent was to become a 'Union of Republics'. The British commonwealth was to be left much reduced, the Dutch West Indies joining Australia and New Zealand in it. The scheme looks like a blue-print of the second stage in a grand operation of three stages, and substantial parts of it were achieved; what was not then accomplished is being energetically attempted now." (pp. 245-246)

       The above report by Mr. Reed is quite prophetic. It goes without saying that almost all of the plan of the mysterious Group for a New World Order has been realized.

Freemasons and Illuminati set up apparatus for the establishment of one-world government

The Council on Foreign Relations

      Abraham asserts that one of the primary reasons these Illuminati worked behind the scenes to forment WWI was to create in its aftermath a world government to control resources of the world. The selling point is peace. Professor Carroll Quigley, Mr. Clinton's own professor at Georgetown University, in his book Tragedy and Hope (MacMillan, New York, 1966) informs us that the secret Round Table was created for Rothschild, to be headed by Lord Milner, using Cecil Rhodes' money. (Is it accidental that Rhodes scholarship fund was created and a Rhodes scholar, Bill Clinton, was nominated and elected President of the U.S.?) The Round Table worked behind the scenes at the highest levels of British government, influencing foreign policy and England's involvement and conduct of WWI.

      Professor Quigley tells us that in New York, the Round Table Group was known as the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). (Quigley, p. 951) According to Quigley, the most important financial dynasties in America following WWI were (in addition to Morgan) the Rockefeller family; Kuhn, Loeb & Company; Dillon Read and Company and Brown Bros., Harriman. (Quigley, p. 529). The founders of CFR include those who financed the Bolshevik Revolution. The CFR has come to be known as "The Establishment," "the invisible government" and "the Rockefeller foreign office." St. Michael called David Rockefeller the man who hides the mask ruling the U.S.

      The CFR's takeover and control of the U.S. Department of State is contained in State Department Publication 2349, Report to the President on the Results of the San Francisco Conference. It is the report of Secretary of State President on the Results of the San Francisco Conference. It is the report of Secretary Edward R. Stettinius (C.F.R.) to President Truman. This document states that new problems after the war required a special committee to deal with them. As a result, a Committee on Post-War Problems was set up with high officials of the State Department (all but one were CFR members) assisted by a research staff who were previously working for CFR but now became part of State Department as Division of Special Research. After Pearl Harbor, the Committee on Post-War Problems became Advisory Committee on Post-War Foreign Policies. (See also the C.F.R.'s booklet, A Record of Twenty Years, 1921-1947.) (ibid., pp. 95-96).

      This is the group which designed the United Nations. The land in Manhattan, New York where the U.N. building now stands was donated by the Rockefellers. (cf. P. Collier and D. Horowitz, The Rockefellers An American Dynasty, Holt, Rinehart Winston, 1976, pp. 246-247).

      The Christian Science Monitor indicates the fantastic power the C.F.R. has had during the last six administrations (before Mr. Reagan's second term): "Almost half of the Council members have been invited to assume official government positions or to act as consultants at one time or another." The policies promoted by the C.F.R. in the fields of defense and international relations become, with a regularity which defies the laws of chance, the official policies of the United States Government. (Abraham, pp. 94-95).

      The CFR dominated President Kennedy's State Department, his Cabinet, and Secretary of State Dean Rusk's staff. Anthony Lukas of the New York Times reported: "Of the first 82 names on a list prepared to help President Kennedy staff his State Department, 63 were Council members. Kennedy once complained, 'I'd like to have some new faces here, but all I get is the same old names.' (James W. Wardner, The Planned Destruction of America, P.O. Box 163141, Altamonte Springs, Florida 32716-3141; 407-865-9722 , p. 60)

      President Nixon appointed 110 CFR members to the highest un-elected offices in the land. (Wardner, op. cit., p. 59)

      President Carter appointed more than 70 men from the CFR and over 20 members of the Trilateral Commission (TC) to the highest unelected offices of government. (Wardner, op. cit., p. 58)

      President Reagan appointed over 80 individuals to his administration who were members of the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, or both. Note especially his running mate, Trilateralist George Bush. Reagan appointed to the highest offices in government: 64 CFR members, 6 Trilateral members, 6 both CFR and Trilateral members, and 5 former members of the Trilateral Commission. (Wardner, op. cit., p. 56.)

      Most of President Clinton's first term cabinet officers were CFR members including Secretary of State, Deputy Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense, National Security Advisor, Deputy National Security Advisor, CIA Director, Chairman of the Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, Secretary of Treasury, Deputy Secretary of the Treasury, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Secretary of the Interior, Under Secretary for Political Affairs, Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs, Aid Coordinator to the Commonwealth of Independent States, Deputy Director, Office of Management and Budget, Chairman, Council of Economic Advisors, U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations (Madeleine Albright who was responsible for foreign policy legislation during the Carter years and was Director of the world-government-promoting Atlantic Council, now Secretary of State under Clinton.) (Wardner, op. cit., pp. 51-52.)

      Dr. James W. Wardner in his well-documented book lists the following:

      Of the eighteen secretaries of the treasury since 1921, twelve have been members of the CFR.

      Of the sixteen secretaries of state, twelve have been CFR members (four have been presidents of Rockefeller Foundation).

      The Defense Department, created in 1947, has had fifteen secretaries; nine have been CFR.

      The CIA, also created in 1947, has had eleven directors seven have been CFR.

      Six of seven superintendents at West Point have been CFR.

      Every supreme Allied commander in Europe has been CFR

      Every U.S. ambassador to NATO has been CFR.

      The Four key positions in every administration, Republican or Democratic, are routinely filled by CFR members:

      National Security Advisor

      Secretary of State

      Secretary of Defense

      Secretary of Treasury

      There are increasing numbers of CFR members in the legislative branch of government. Pat Schroeder (D-CO), Christopher Dodd (D-CT), Newt Gingrich (R-GA), Warren Rudman (R-NH), Bob Graham (D-FL), Thomas Foley (D- WA), Charles Robb (D-VA), John D. Rockefeller, IV (D-WV) are all members.

      George Bush had 387 members of the CFR in his administration. Ronald Reagan had 313.

The team of Clinton and Gore is financed and supported by the CFR as well. Clinton is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission.

      Perot, the outsider in the 1992 elections, picked CFR people to run his campaign.

Total CFR membership as of December 1992 was 2905.

      The objective of the CFR and CFR-controlled State Department is to completely disarm the whole world including America and let the United Nations have a monopoly on armed forces which they called the U.N. Peace Force. (Wardner, op. cit., pp. 67-68).

      In his stunning book The Most Secret Science, retired Air Force Colonel Archibald Roberts states: "Under this plan, the United States will finance and man a totalitarian UN military complex." (Wardner, op. cit., p. 68). According to the CFR and its agency the U.S. State Department, even the U.S. would not have the power to challenge the U.N. Peace Force. Consequently, Colonel Roberta continues: "The enormity of this subversion is nearly incomprehensible -- as is the failure of the American people to protest the criminal abrogation of the United States Constitution. As one American soldier, I bitterly resent being turned over to an organization whose every precept and very existence contravenes the Constitution I have sworn to uphold." (p. 133, quoted in Wardner, op. cit, p. 68).

      While media reports and discusses everything else except the CFR and its objectives. This is because, according to CFR's own 1987 report, 262 of its members are "journalists, correspondents, and communications executives." (Wardner, op. cit., p. 70).

      The Illuminati, through the C.F.R., has spread its influence to other vital areas of American society. Its members have run or are running NBC, CBS, ABC, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times, the Chicago Sun, the Des Moines Register, the Wall Street Journal, Time, Life, Newsweek, Fortune, Business Week.

      Here is the list of well-known reporters and anchors who have been or are current members of the CFR:

      CBS: Bill Moyers CFR, William Paley CFR, Dan Rather CFR, Harry Reasoner CFR.

      NBC: Tom Brokaw CFR, John Chancellor CFR, Marvin Kalb CFR, Irving R. Levine CFR.

      ABC: David Brinkley CFR, Ted Koppel CFR Diane Sawyer CFR, John Scali CFR, Barbara Walters CFR.

      CNN: Daniel Schorr CFR.

      PBS: Hodding Carter III CFR, Jim Lehrer CFR, Robert McNeil CFR.

      (The list is based on James Wardner, Planned Destruction of America, p. 143.)

      It is a conspiracy of silence among the media to keep American people in the dark about the CFR's plan to subvert the U.S. Constitution and to create a dictatorial one-world government under the leadership of the emerging Anti-Christ. In his opening statement to the secret Bilderberger meeting in Germany 1991, David Rockefeller included the acknowledgment: "We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time magazine, and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion [silence] for almost forty years....It would have been impossible for us to develop our Plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during these years." (Larry Abraham, Insider Report, January 1992, p. 2.) In other words, the success of the conspiracy to set up one-world government under the Anti-Christ is due in part to the cooperation of the media sector. When the Anti-Christ finally arrives on the world scene, do you think that the media people would be on our side, the side of freedom?

The Trilateral Commission

      The roots of the Trilateral Commission (TC) stem from a book Between Two Ages written by Zbigniew Brzezinski in 1970 while he was a professor at Columbia University in New York City. David Rockefeller read the book and was impressed with its contents. The book inspired Rockefeller to create the TC.

      In July 1972, 8 members of CFR, among whom were David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski founded the Trilateral Commission. The Commission's purpose is to engineer an enduring partnership among the ruling classes of North America, Western Europe, and Japan -- hence the term 'Trilateral' -- in an attempt to influence public opinions and government decision-makings in such a way that the peoples, governments and economies of all nations must serve the needs of multinational banks and corporations. To achieve this, Trilateralists must manage both dependence and democracy -- at home and abroad. In other words, they must reduce the mass to dependency and suppress democracy and any voice of protest through control and surveillance. The ultimate aim would be to establish an one-world economy, one-world government, one-world monetary system, and one-world religion. The following excerpts from official TC's documents, together with writings and speeches of founding members will confirm this.

      In his book With No Apologies (1979), Senator Barry Goldwater writes: "The C.F.R. is the American branch of a society which originated in England. Internationalistic in viewpoint, the C.F.R., along with the Atlantic Union Movement, and the Atlantic Council of the U.S., believes national boundaries should be obliterated and one-world rule established ... What the Trilaterals truly intend is the creation of a worldwide economic power superior to the political government of the nation-states involved. As managers and creators of the system they will rule the world ... In my view, the Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power: political, monetary, intellectual, and ecclesiastical." (With No Apologies, pp. 128, 284).

      The TC took the position that "the economic officials of ... the largest countries must begin to think in terms of managing a single world economy, in addition to managing international economic relations among countries" (The Reform of International Institutions: A Report of the Trilateral Tank Force on International Institutions to the Trilateral Commission , New York: The Trilateral Commission, 1976, p. 22.)

In order to achieve the goal of world domination in the form of one-world government, the Trilateralists need to control the U.S. and other governments.

      Senator Barry Goldwater observed, "Whereas the Council on Foreign Relations is distinctly national in membership, the Trilateral Commission is international. Representation is allocated equally to Western Europe, Japan, and the United States. It is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interest by seizing control of the political government of the United States." ( With No Apologies, p. 280.)

      Holly Sklar, in her book Trilateralism, says, "These men make the most important foreign, economic, and domestic policy decisions of the U. S. government today; they set the goals and direction for the administration." (p. 208.)

      In Kissinger on the Couch (1975) authors Phyllis Schlafly and former CFR member Chester Ward state: "Once the ruling members of the CFR have decided that the US Government should adopt a particular policy, the very substantial research facilities of the CFR are put to work to develop arguments, intellectual and emotional, to support the new policy, and to confound and discredit, intellectually and politically, any opposition. . . " According to Ward, the CFR's goal is the "submergence of US sovereignty and national independence into an all-powerful one-world govemment. . . This lust to surrender the sovereignty and independence of the United States is pervasive throughout most of the membership. . . In the entire CFR lexicon, there is no term of revulsion carrying a meaning so deep as 'America First.'" (Dennis L. Cuddy and Robert H. Golsborough, The Network of Power and Part II The New World Order: Chronology and Commentary, Baltimore: The American Research Foundation, Inc., 1993, p.17.)

      Senator Goldwater revealed, "David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski found Jimmy Carter their ideal candidate. They helped him win the nomination and the presidency. To accomplish this purpose, they mobilized the money power of the Wall Street bankers, the intellectual influence of the academic community-which is subservient to the wealth of the great tax-free foundations -- and the media controllers represented in the membership of the CFR and the Trilateral." ( With No Apologies, p. 286.) Senator Golwater continued, "Brzezinski and Rockefeller invited Carter to be a member of the Trilateral Commission in 1973. They immediately began grooming him for the Presidency ... We have arrived at our present position of peril in the world and at home because our leaders have refused to tell us the truth ... unless we, who profess to believe in freedom, wake up, the world is headed for a period of slavery." (With No Apologies, p. 299.) Now you understand why a virtual unknown could zoom to the presidency in 1976. Carter was labeled the ultimate outsider, but actually he was an insider -- a Trilateralist.

      Early on in Carter's appointee process the Washington Post remarked, "If you like conspiracy theories about secret plots to take over the world, you are going to love the administration of President-elect Jimmy Carter...." (January 16, 1977.) (Comment: The conspiracy by the Trilateralists is no longer a theory but a fact! But, of course, the Washington Post is part of the conspiracy.)

      In his White House memoirs, Brzezinski acknowledged, "Moreover, all the key foreign policy decision-makers of the Carter Administration had previously served in the Trilateral Commission...." (Power & Principle: Memoirs of the National Security Advisor, 1977-1981, New York: Farrar, Straus, Giroux, 1983, p. 289.) The U.S. News and World Report assessed the impact of Trilateralists' power under Carter: "The 'Trilateralists' have taken charge of foreign policy making in the Carter Administration, and already the immense power they wield is sparking some controversy. Active or former members of the Trilateral Commission now head every key agency involved in mapping U.S. strategy for dealing with the rest of the world ... some see this concentration of power as a conspiracy at work." (February 21, 1977.)

      Since Brzezinski, who became its founding executive director, provides the rationale for the creation of TC, we would like to further examine the ideas contained in his book Between Two Ages (p. 300):

      "Though Stalinism may have been a needless tragedy for both the Russian people and communism as an ideal, there is the intellectually tantalizing possibility that for the world at large it was, as we shall see, a blessing in disguise." (Note: Stalin had massacred at least 20 million people and here Brzezinski praises the ideology of this mass murderer.)

      "Marxism represents a further vital and creative stage in the maturing of man's universal vision. Marxism is simultaneously a victory of the external man over the inner, passive man and a victory of reason over belief." (Note: he believes in the god of reason.)

      "In the absence of social consensus society's emotional and rational needs may be fused -- mass media makes this easier to achieve -- in the person of an individual who is seen as...making the necessary innovations in the social order." (Note: he calls for a charismatic individual who can change the social order, i.e. the Anti-Christ.)

      "Such a society would be dominated by an elite whose claim to political power would rest on allegedly superior scientific know-how. Unhindered by the restraints of traditional liberal values, this elite would not hesitate to achieve its political ends by the latest modern techniques for influencing public behavior and keeping society under close surveillance and control."

      "Movement toward such a community (of developed nations)... would involve the forging of community links among the United States, Western Europe, and Japan (a Trilateral Commission stated objective)."

"Though the objective of shaping a community of the developed nations is less ambitious than the goal of world government, it is more attainable."

      "The Soviet Union could have emerged as the standard-bearer of this century's most influential system of thought and as the social model for resolving the key dilemmas facing modern man."

      Marxism "supplied the best available insight into contemporary reality. Marxist theory [is] this century's most infuential system of thought."

      'The approaching 200th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence could justify the call for a national Constitutional convention to reexamine the nation's formal institutional framework."

      Brzezinski's ideas above fit in exactly with those of David Rockefeller who stated in 1973 after his visit to China:

      "The social experiment of China under Chairman Mao's leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history." (quoted by New York Times, "From a China Traveler," August 10, 1973.) Among the social experiment was the creation of a commune system in which "the family unit is broken up...The children are taken away from the parents and placed in government-run nurseries...The parents may see their children once a week and when they see them they cannot show affection toward the children. The idea is to have the children and the family sever their affection and direct it toward the state. Names are taken away from the children and they are given numbers.  There is no individual identity... The commune system is destroying morality in Red China: There is no morality because the love of the family is taken away. There is no honesty and respect among men or between men. There is no human dignity: they are all like animals. There is no guilt associated with murder of individuals for the improvement of the state." ( Sworn statement before the House Un-American Activities Committee by the Reverend Shik-Ping Wang, East Asia Director of the Baptist Evangelization Society International, in Myron C. Fagan, The Truth About "National Council of Churches", CPA Book Publishers, Boring, Oregon, p. 10.)

      This is the Communist system that Rockefeller praises, a system in which 64 million persons were killed as result of Mao's social experiment. The number is based on the U.S. Senate Internal Security Subcommittee's report.

      A major Trilateral Commission position paper entitled "The Crisis of Democracy" the authors, Michael Crozier, Samuel Huntington and Joji Watanuki, conclude that popular participation by the people of the Trilateral nations in government policymaking is a bad proposition. According to the study, the ruling elites in the United States and Western Europe are already facing grass-roots dissent from the ranks of their people and that will be necessary "to restore amore equitable relationship between government authority and popular control." In other words, the power of the Trilateral elites and the governnments they control must be strengthened -- and the power of the people must be diminished.

      In the 1981 book Democratic Dictatorship: The Emergent Constitution of Control Arthur S. Miller describes a "new feudal order" controlled by elitists, and asserts that "dictatorship will come -- is coming -- but with the acquiescence of the people. . . The goal is 'predictable' man."

      In view of the Marxist thoughts espoused by Brzezinski and Rockefeller, which are also dominant among Trilateralists, it no surprise that they would accept holocausts, mass murders, and dictatorship of the Communist regimes. The question immediately coming to mind is: who are being rational here, the Trilateralists -- the elites -- or the dominated people under them? Indeed, we are coming to an age of barbarism where the elite's decision-makings are no longer guided by reason, much less by God's commandments, but instead by overriding passions like greed for power and money. In the age of barbarism, we would expect much chaos and disorder. This is exactly what will be needed by the Anti-Christ for the population of the world to accept him as the "savior".

      The Trilateralists' ready acceptance of such crimes against humanity would seem incomprehensible if we forget another major objective of TC: to reduce what it termed the "rapidly growing population" and to solve the problems of "overpopulation." It called on the developed countries to increase their aid "substantially", including, of course, "family planning", to the less-developed countries. But these grants-in-aid are not without strings. "Grants can properly be subject to conditions to achieve their stated objectives" and "recipient countries whose sense of national sovereignty is offended by such conditions can decline the foreign assistance." These conditions are already imposed in Sections 102 and 104(d) of the U.S. International Development and Food Assistance Act - i.e., countries receiving American aid must take steps to curb their population growth. (Towards a Renovated International System: A Report of the Trilateral Integrators Task Force to the Trilateral Commission, New York: Trilateral Commission, 1977, p. 28.) From there we know that abortion (i.e. murders of the unborn) and birth control are forced on those poor countries that receive both U.S. and U.N. aids.

      First, the Report prepared for the Masonic Club of Rome posited that as the world population was growing out of control, the non-renewable resources of the world would eventually run out and the world economy would mire in depression and misery. Worst still, the whole civilization may collapse as a result of the lack of a drastic response to this critical problem. (Donella H. Meadows, Dennis L. Meadows et al., The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome's Project on the Predicament of Mankind, New York: Universe Books, 1972). Next, the Carter administration's Global 2000 Report, which was essentially written by Trilateralists, predicted: "With the persistence of human poverty and misery, the staggering growth of human population, and ever increasing human demands, the possibilities of further stress and permanent damage to the planet's resource base are very real." (The Global 2000 Report to the President: Global Future: Time to Act, prepared by the Council on Environmental Quality and the U.S Department of State, Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, January 1981, p. ix.) In his January 14, 1981, Farewell Address, President Jimmy Carter reemphasized the overriding importance his administration had attached to the problem of "overpopulation". (Jimmy Carter, "Farewell Address: Major Issues Facing the Nation", Vital Speeches of the Day, vol XLVII, no.8, February 1, 1981, p. 227.) More extreme than these are ideas of Kenneth Boulding, Isaac Asimov, and Garrett Hardin who compared the earth with a spaceship or an overloaded life boat. (K. Boulding, "The Economics of the Coming Spaceship Earth," in Henry Jarrett, ed. Enviromental Quality in a Growing Economy, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins, 1966; I. Asimov, Earth, Our Crowded Spaceship, New York: John Day, 1974; G. Hardin, "Living on a Life Boat," BioScience, Oct. 1974.) The implication is that there is enough food only for a few elite people on the lifeboat or the spaceship. As there is not enough food to feed the excess number of people (the poor, the mass) they should be thrown overboard (i.e. killed off by wars or epidemics.) These "reasonings" provide justification for curbing population growth and destroying excess population by every means including wars, genocides, epidemics, starvation, economic depressions, and, yes, terrorism. They also provide justification for preserving the environment in an extreme way (extreme environmentalism). From this we can deduce that conflicts, wars, genocides, and massacres in Africa, Bosnia, the Middle-East, or elsewhere for that matter, will never be resolved or stopped.

Environmentalism becomes a powerful and insidious pretext to implement controlled economic depressions.

      (Comment: Even the whole material universe could not be compared with a single human soul which was created in the image and likeness of God. And here we are, people are to be destroyed and sacrificed for the sake preserving the soulless and inanimate earth and its resources! What an abominable idolatry! We do not deny that what God has created in the earth is good and must be respected and used in a frugal way by human beings. To protect the environment and its resources is good. However, to sacrifice people whose souls are immortal to preserve soon-to-pass-away, soulless things is perverse to the extreme. This can only be conceived in the mind of Satan whom many Trilateralists perhaps worship.)

The Bilderberg Group

      The Group takes its name from the hotel in Holland where it first met in 1954. Meets regularly (presumably on a once-a-year basis) at various locations around the world, always in extreme secrecy, often at resorts controlled by the Rockefeller family. It has a revolving membership of several hundred participants composed of elites from the United States and Western Europe, primarily-almost exclusively from the NATO countries. The Rothschild family is the leading European force within the Bilderberg group, sharing its power with the American-based Rockefeller empire. It maintains an extremely low profile and seldom, if ever, publishes reports or studies under its own official aegis.

      Bilderberg participants denied the group's very existence for decades until forced into the open by the glare of media publicity, generated largely by The SPOTLIGHT (300 Independence Ave., SE, Washington, D.C. 20003) and its newsletter-format predecessors, "Liberty Letter" and "Liberty Lowdown" (the latter publication is now defunct).  

      These leaders take care of "world" business. even the decision to divide Germany into East and West was made by men who later proved to be Bilderbergers. (Peter Thompson, "Bilderberg and The West," in Sklar, Trilateralism, Part III, Chap. 2, p. 160.) 

      Liberty Lowdown, (Washington DC Liberty Lobby, July 1974). " As soon as the Bilderbergers got home from their April 1971 meeting in Woodstock, Vermont, billions of dollars started mysteriously flooding out of America." Four months later the dollar was no longer convertible into gold, and thereafter the administration let the dollar float (i.e., no fixed value against gold or any other reserve asset). The increasing flow of dollars out of America and into Europe continued until just before the devaluation. On December 18, 1971, the dollar was devalued 8.5 percent. This devaluation signaled the end of American finance independence. By conspiring against the dollars, they sold the dollars short, thereby making a profit equal approximately $15-$20 billion.  

      The noted British authority on international groups, A.K. Chesterton, in "The New Unhappy Lords," asserts "...it will be seen that the proper study of political mankind is the study of power elites, without which nothing that happens can be understood...." ("The New Unhappy Lords, An Exposure of Power Politics", in Liberty Lowdown: A Confidential Washington Report, Washington D.C.: Liberty Lobby, p. 9.) "I affirm that the influences behind the European movement which made use of Retinger's (secretary general, Bilderberg meeting, Buxton, Derbyshire, 1958) idealism are, from a national and Christian point of view, thoroughly unwholesome and indeed evil in that what they seek is monopoly of political and financial power. Evil, too, is the method ... I propose to designate them as the chosen lackeys of the New York Money Power charged with the task of plotting to bring into being a One World tyranny." (A.K. Chesterton, The New Unhappy Lords, An Exposure of Power Politics, Hawthorne, CA: Christian Boys Club of America, 1969).  

      Senator John R. Rarick as he disclosed the secret workings of the Bilderbergers to the House of Representatives:  

      "Mr. Speaker, on several occasions during rccent months, I called the attention of our colleagues to activities of the Bilderbergers -- an elite intenlational group comprised of high govemment officials international financiers, businessmen, and opinion-makers....  

      "This exclusive international aristocracy holds highly secret meetings annually or more often in various countries. The limited information available about what transpires at these meetings reveals that they discuss matters of vital importance which affect the lives of all citizens. Presidential Advisor Henry Kissinger, who made a secret visit to Peking from July 9 to July 11, 1971, and arranged for a presidential visit to Red China, was reported to be in attendance at the most recent Bilderberg meeting held in Woodstock, Vermont, April 23 to April 25, 1971. The two points reportedly discussed at the Woodstock meeting were, 'the contribution of business in dealing with current problems of social instability' and 'the possibility of a change of the American role in the world and its consequences.' 

      "Following these secret discussions, which are certainly not in keeping with the Western political tradition of 'open covenants openly arrived at,' the participants returned to their respective countries with the general public left uninformed, notwithstanding the attendance of some news media representatives, of any of the recommendations and plans agreed upon as a result of the discussions -- or for that matter even the occurrence of the meeting itself." (John R. Rarick, Congressional Record, 92nd Congress, 1st Session, Wednesday, Volume 117, No. 133, 15 September 1971, pp. E9615-E9624.)  

      Dr. Wardner provides us with a list of names in the steering committee: 

      David Rockefeller (CFR, TC), Edmond de Rothschild (French banker), William Bundy (Longtime editor of CFR's Foreign Affairs),Giovanni Agnelli (TC) (Head of Italy's FIAT), Otto Wolff (TC) (top German industrialist), Theo Sommer (CFR) (Top German columnist), Arthur Taylor (CFR) (Former chaiman of CBS), Niel Norlund (CFR) (Chief editor of Denmark's Berlingske Tindende). 

      Honorable John R. Rarick from the Congressional Record: " All the Americans on the Steering Committee are members or officers of the Council on Foreign Relations in New York City, an organization that has a more than symbiotic relation with the Rockefeller-Standard Oil empire...." Senator Rarick went on to list the banks and corporations that are represented at Bilderberg: 

      Banks: 

      Chase Manhattan Bank (President: David Rockefeller), Manufacturers Hanover Trust (President: Gabriel Hauge), First National City Bank (Chairman: James Rockefeller), Morgan Guaranty Trust, Chemical Bank, New York Trust Company, Continental Illinois Bank (Fomer chaiman of the board, David Kennedy CFR who was also past Secretary of the Treasury under Nixon), Banque de France, Banque de Bruxelles, Dillon, Read and Co. (President: C. Douglas Dillon CFR (also former secretary of the treasury under Eisenhower), Toronto Dominion Bank, World Bank (President: Robert McNamara CFR, former Secretary of Defense under Kennedy), Bank of Canada, House of Rothschild (Baron Edmond de Rothschild), Stockholmes Enskilda Bank (Vice-chairman: Marcus Wallenberg). 

      Corporations: 

      General Motors, Standard Oil, Ford, General Electric, DuPont, Alcoa, Allied Chemical, Royal Dutch Shell, Fiat, Pirelli, Unilever, Beers Consolidated Mines, Ltd. 

      At the June 1991 Bilderberger meeting in Baden-Baden, Germany, a few of the notable attendees were:  

      David Rockefeller, Bill Clinton, Michael Boskin (Chairman of the Bush's Council of Economic Advisors), Nicholas Brady (Bush's Treasury Secretary), Theodore L. Elliot, Jr. (Previous U.S. Ambassador to Afghamstan), Emilio Collado (Executive Vice President of Exxon which is owned by Rockefeller), Katherine Graham (Washington Post), John Reed (Chairman of Citicorp which is controlled by Rothschild), Senator John Chaffee (Republican - Rhode Island), Governor Doug Wilder (Virginia), Vice President Dan Quayle.  

      The United Nations is to be transformed into the one-world government in the New World Order

Much information of this section comes from Dennis L. Cuddy and Robert H. Golsborough, The New World Order: Chronology and Commentary, Vol. I & II, 1993, The American Research Foundation, Inc., P.O. Box 5687, Baltimore, Maryland 21210. 

      Books popularize concept of New World Order during 1940-1941.  

      The New World Order by H.G.Wells.  

      The New World Order by Muhammad Ali.  

      The New World Order published by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.  

      "The New World Order: A Japanese View" in Contemporary Japan, by Iwao Ayusawa.  

      "Designs for a World Order" : Ralph Page' Annals Of The American Academy of Political and Socful Science.  

      Peace Commission Report issued by the Commission to Study the Organization of Peace.

Organizations of the New World Order

      The 1944 Bretton Woods Agreement created the World Bank (WB), the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the General Agreement of Trade and Tariffs (GATT). The WB and the IMF will become the banks of the One-World Government when the Anti-Christ assumes power.  

      Creation of the United Nations in 1945. The UN Charter was written Alger Hiss, CFR member, the key foreign policy advisor to President Franklin D. Roosevelt. The Charter gives the Soviet Union three votes in the General Assembly and the U.S only one. Hiss was the first Chairman of the U.N. In 1950 His was tried for perjury for denying that he had been a Soviet Agent and was found guilty in spite of the fact that John Foster Dulles served as a character witness; and in 1954, he was released from prison.  

      State Department in its Document No. 7277, 1961 entitled "Freedom from War: The US Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World", detailed a 3-stage plan to disarm all nations and arm the UN, with a final stage in which "no state would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened UN Peace Force."  

      In an 1968 Associated Press report, CFR member Nelson Rockefeller pledged that as president he would "work toward international creation of a new world order." (He lost the Republication nomination for president that year to Richard Nixon.)  

      During the1972 Presidential visit to China, in his toast to Premier Chou En-lai, former CFR member Nixon expressed "the hope that each of us has to build a new world order."  

      In the May 18, 1972 speech on the coming of world govemment, Roy M. Ash, Head of the Office of Management and Budget, declared that "within two decades the institutional framework for a World Economic Community will be in place. . . [and] aspects of individual sovereignty will be given over to supernational authority."

In his book World Without Borders, 1972, author and CFR mem 

      ber Lester Brown, president of Worldwatch Institute, stated: "effective supernational institutions . invariably require that countries sacrifice a measure of national sovereignty. . . The existing international system based on competition and conflict and superpower dominance will not work over the longer term. It must be replaced by a new world order, one based on cooperation and a sense of community."  

      In RIO: Reshaping the International Order (1976), the Club of Rome called for a new international order, including an economic redistribution of wealth, concluding: "A new world order must of necessity be based upon the recognition of the interdependence between both rich and poor nations. . . A new value system more appropriate to future need screaming in the decade ahead."  

      In "The Trilateral Connection" appearing in the July edition of Atlantic Monthly, author Jeremiah Novak stated: "For the third time in this century, a group of American Scholars, businessmen, and govemment officials is planning to fashion a New World Order. . . These men are looking to a 'community of developed nations' to coordinate international political and economic affairs."  

      In their journal Across Frontiers published in 1985, the World Constitution and Parliament Association's secretary general asserted: "To escape from this trap (recycling loans) requires a truly New World Economic Order, which includes a new world financial and credit system based upon productive capacity and a single world monetary system. The introduction of such vast changes cannot be done by negotiations one-by-one among sovereign nations, but requires collective action by non-aligned and debtor countries within the framework of a new global system of finances mandated under a world constitution. By organized and collective action within the context of an emerging world parliament and world federation, the demand for acceptance of the new world economic order becomes possible."  

      In The Secret Constitution and the Need for Constitutional Change (1987), sponsored in part by the Rockefeller Foundation, author Arthur S. Miller, stated: "a pervasive system of thought control exists in the Uniled States...the citizenry is indodrinated by employment of the mass media and the system of public education. . . people are told what to think about ... the old order is crumbling ... Nationalism should be seen as a dangerous social disease. . . A new vision is required to plan and manage the future, a global vision that will transcend national boundaries and eliminate the poison of nationalistic 'solutions'. . . a new Constitution is necessary. . . Americans really have no choice, for constitutional alteration will come whether or not it is liked or planned for. ... Ours is the age of the planned society . . . No other way is possible."  

      In a January 11, 1988 address to the City Club of Cleveland President Reagan remarked: "Even more than in the past, this new world economy is a one-world economy... In this new world economy, national boundaries are increasingly becoming obsolele.. . these new economic realities dictate a world economy."  

      At a fund-raising speech in San Francisco in 1990, President Bush remarked: "Time and again in this century , the political map of the world was transformed. And in each instance, a new world order came about througth the advent of a new tyrant or the outbreak of a bloody global war, or its end." This is nearly seven months before the tyrant Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait and President Bush supposedly adopted the concept of a "New World Order."  

      Prior to the Iraqi's invasion of Kuwait on August 2, 1990, US Ambassador to Iran, April Glaspie, told Saddam, "we have no opinion on the Arab-Arab conflicts, like your border disagreements with Kuwait . . The issue is not associated with America. .. We hope you solve this problem by any suitable means."  

      Secretary of State Baker's spokesman Margaret Tutweiler confirmed Ambassador Glaspie: ". . . the US was not obligated to come to Kuwait's aid if the emirate were attacked." Two days before the invasion, the Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern and South Asian Affairs, John H. Kelly, gave Congress the same message that Glaspie had given Saddam. Thus, Hussein carried out the invasion in part because he believed that the US would not join the conflict. He was deliberately misled by the U.S. officials because President Bush wanted to find a new tyrant or the outbreak of a bloody global war in order to set up the New World Order.  

      In a September 11, 1991 address to Congress entitled "Toward a New World Order", President Bush said, "the crisis in the Persian Gulf offers a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times... a new world order can emerge, in which the nations of the world, east and west, north and south, can prosper and live in harmonic struggling to be born." And in a UN address, October 1, 1991 Bush spoke of the "collective strength of the world community expressed by the UN... a historic movement towards a new world order. . . a new partnership of nations. . . a time when humankind came into its own. . . to bring about a revolution of the spirit and the mind and began a journey into a . . . new age." (Note: The Gulf War allowed Bush to move toward the New World Order by allowing him to seek the approval of the U.N. Security Council before attacking Iraq, implicitly acknowledging the U.N. to be a world government above the U.S. Since when did the U.S., the most powerful country in the world, have to seek permission from a supranational authority to go to war?)  

      Paul Lewis reported in an article in New York Times in 1992 that "in its summit declaration the Security Council widened its definition of what constitutes a threat to peace and security in today's world, saying this now includes 'proliferation of all weapons of mass destruction' as well as "non-military sources of instability in the economic, social, humanitanan and ecological fields." (This implies that the U.N. can intervene militarily into a country for any reason whatsoever if it perceives a problem originating from that country to be a threat to world peace!)

In a January 31, 1992 address, President Bush urged the UN "to abando 

      n its hallowed tradition of non-interference in the internal affairs of countries. .. (declaring) that the world community can no longer allow advancement of fundamental rights to stop at national borders." Following this, 15 members of the Security Council proclaimed "a rough outline for a new world order run partly through the United Nations," most of the initiatives coming from countries other than the U.S.  

      At a speech delivered in 1992 at Fulton, Missouri, the site of Winston Churchill's famous "Iron curtain" speech, Mikhail Gorbachev announced: "This is not just some ordinary stage of development like many others in world history. . . An intensifying integration of the world opens the possibility of creating a global international security system. . . An awareness of the need of some kind of global government is gaining ground. . . A special body should be set up under the United Nations Security Council with the right to employ political, diplomatic, economic, and military means to settle and prevent conflicts. . . I believe that the new world order will not be fully realized unless the United Nations and its Security Council create structures, taking into consideration existing United Nations and regional structures which are authorized to impose sanctions and make use of other measures of compulsion .... The Security Council would require more effective and more numerous peacekeeping armed forces at the disposal of the Security Council making them subordinate to the United Nations military command ... a powerful process of technical and political internationalization is taking place..."  

      A Washington Post editorial in 1992 states that UN Secretary-General Boutros-Ghali, "would have member states yield 'some sovereign prerogatives to larger, common political associations."'  

      A The New York Times editorial in 1992 declared: "The army of tomorrow is neither the Red Army nor the US Army. . . If there is to be peace, it will be secured by a multinational force that monitors cease-fires and elections and protects human rights. Blue-helmeted United Nations peacekeepers. . . American opinion is broadly receptive to UN peacekeeping to contain turbulence abroad. According to a Roper survey commission, 55% of Americans would rely on UN forces even in conflicts involving US interests."  

      The Los Angeles Times reported in 1995 that U.N. General Secretary Boutros-Ghali requested to raise a 500,000 strong standing, independent army for the U.N.

Conclusions

      From the writings, speeches, documents of Freemasons and Illuminati, and members of the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, and the Bilderberg Group, it becomes unmistakebly clear that wars, conflicts, revolutions, genocides, pandemics, epidemics, plagues, famines, shortages, terrorism, chaos, disorders, panics and scares, economic depressions, stock market crashes, banking collapses have to be found, or, if not found, created and spread. However deplorable these events are and however criminal the activities to create these man-made events are from the common man's view, they are necessary for these elites to set up the One-World Government with its own army under the leadership of a preternaturally charismatic leader, namely the Satan-incarnated Anti-Christ, who will be acceptable to most nations.  

      Remember that God's kingdom is absolute order and peace. By contrast, Satan's kingdom (such as in Hell) is absolute disorder and fear. While God respects man's free will absolutely in the latter's choice of worshiping Him or not, the Anti-Christ will coerce people to worship him. But he cannot coerce the population if he cannot control them. That is why the micro-chip (the material mark of the beast) becomes a necessary tool of coercion. Once a person accepts the chip, he/she cannot but obey the Anti-Christ because he/she has no means of escaping his control. That is why God warned in the Book of Apocalypse (chapter 14: 9-11) and continues to warn mankind in messages given to true seers not to accept the micro-chip on the hand.